avatar image

Hong Kong’s bamboo scaffolders worry the tradition will disappear

Published: 
Listen to this article

City’s Development Bureau has announced a move to use more metal scaffolding, but some workers disapprove of the measure

SCMP |
Published: 
Comment

Latest Articles

Hong Kong’s bamboo scaffolders worry the tradition will disappear

Top 10: What advice would you give your 5-year-old self?

Help! My friends can’t keep my secrets – what do I do?

China warns Chinese tourists travelling to US to take ‘caution’

DSE 2025: citizen and social development exam ‘easy’, some students say

InfoSpark: What year is it? It depends on the calendar you’re using!

Hong Kong’s traditional bamboo scaffolding is under threat as metal alternatives gain favour. Photo: Elson Li

Ho Ping-tak brimmed with pride as he remembered the many landmarks he had worked on, including the International Commerce Centre and the new Kai Tak Stadium.

“I have put in a lot of blood and sweat,” said the 50-year-old scaffolder. He is the chairman of the Hong Kong and Kowloon Bamboo Scaffolding Workers Union (Tung-king).

Hong Kong has around 10,000 registered scaffolders who swiftly set up and pull down sturdy bamboo at construction sites, using techniques passed down several generations.

The city’s Development Bureau has announced that metal scaffolding must be used in half of new public building construction sites. People in favour of the move said metal was more fire-resistant.

However, Ho said safety problems happen because of work schedules and not enough official inspections. He added that metal scaffolding becomes unbearable in hot weather.

Arguing in favour of bamboo scaffolding, he said: “It is Hong Kong’s pride … Why can’t the government see that?”

In addition, taking down metal scaffolding built around a 30-floor building could take up to a month – compared to just a week for bamboo.

Sign up for the YP Teachers Newsletter
Get updates for teachers sent directly to your inbox
By registering, you agree to our T&C and Privacy Policy
Comment