Elon Musk’s X aiding influencers to capitalise on misinformation about the Israel-Gaza war
- The social media platform has rolled out an ad revenue-sharing programme for verified users, who often peddle false information for profit
- There has been a tsunami of falsehoods online about the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, fuelled partly by prominent US content creators
Online content creators on social media platform X are capitalising on misinformation about conflicts in the Middle East. Photo: AFPOnline context creators on social media platform X are capitalising on misinformation about conflicts in the Middle East, leveraging the platform’s contentious policies that researchers say prioritise engagement over accuracy.
Since Elon Musk’s turbulent 2022 acquisition of X, formerly Twitter, the site has restored thousands of once-banned accounts and introduced a paid verification system that critics say has boosted conspiracy theorists.
X also rolled out an ad revenue-sharing programme for verified users, who often peddle hateful and false information to profit from the platform.
“Cynical pay-for-play controversialists today deliberately induce anger for engagement to game Musk’s platform into giving them more visibility, and therefore more revenue for their views,” Imran Ahmed, chief executive of the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), said.
He added that Musk “created a topsy-turvy platform on which authoritative sources struggle to be heard above the noise – while liars and hate actors are put on a pedestal, generating revenue for themselves and the platform”.
X has seen a tsunami of falsehoods about the ongoing war between Israel and the Palestinian militant group Hamas, fuelled partly by prominent US influencers such as Jackson Hinkle, who last month falsely claimed a video showed Iran bombing American military bases in Iraq.
The incendiary post came amid widespread concerns about a wider conflagration in the Middle East.
Your Voice: Innocent suffer in war in Gaza Strip (long letters)
Using a reverse image search, fact-checkers found the video actually depicted an attack in Iraq’s Kurdistan region.
In another provocative post debunked, Hinkle wrongly claimed that Yemen had declared “war with Israel” in support of the Palestinians.
While Yemen’s Houthi rebels have targeted Israel with missiles and drones, neither they nor the country’s internationally recognised government has formally declared war.
In addition to raising tens of thousands of dollars on crowdfunding sites, Hinkle offers “premium content” to subscribers on X for US$3 (HK$24) per month.
“Your support helps me continue exposing the Deep State after I was banned & demonetised by YouTube, Twitch, PayPal & Venmo,” his appeal says.
Hinkle – whose false posts have garnered millions of views – refused to say how much revenue he was generating on X, instead criticising coverage of the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East.
Hong Kong doctor shares tales of unprecedented suffering in Palestine hospital
Hinkle makes at least US$3,000 (HK$23,500) a month from paid subscribers, according to a rough CCDH estimate based on the engagement data of his subscriber-only posts.
Last August, Hinkle disclosed on X that he also earned US$1,693 (HK$13,200) through the ad revenue-sharing scheme, while complaining that other users with smaller engagement were getting bigger payouts.
Britain-based creator Sulaiman Ahmed and Danish physician Anastasia Maria Loupis – both of whom AFP has repeatedly fact-checked for war-related misinformation – are also reaping the benefits of X’s verification and paid subscriber programmes.
Neither responded to requests for comment.
To be eligible for ad revenue sharing, users must meet requirements such as subscribing to X’s US$8 (HK$63) per month premium subscription and having at least 500 followers.
Last year, Musk said posts with Community Notes – an X feature that allows users to refute claims and offer additional context – would be “ineligible for revenue share.”
“The idea is to maximise the incentive for accuracy over sensationalism,” Musk wrote on X.
X’s reputation under Musk hit as misinformation spreads about Israel-Gaza conflict
But Jack Brewster, from the media watchdog NewsGuard, said that “viral posts advancing misinformation frequently do not get flagged by Community Notes.”
In October, NewsGuard analysed 250 of the most popular posts promoting one of 10 prominent false or unsubstantiated narratives about the Israel-Gaza war.
Only 32 per cent of them had been flagged by a Community Note, it found.
The following month, NewsGuard identified ads from 86 major companies – including top brands, governments, and non-profit – on viral posts advancing “false or egregiously misleading claims about the Israel-Gaza war.”
That included an ad for the FBI on a post from Hinkle that falsely claimed a video showed an Israeli military helicopter firing on its own citizens.
The video actually showed Israeli warplanes over Gaza, NewsGuard said, adding that the post – viewed nearly 2 million times – did not have a Community Note.
“Community Notes as currently structured is not a system that scales to cover all contexts,” Jacob Shapiro, a Princeton University professor who served on the program’s advisory group before Musk’s acquisition said.
“To expect volunteer labour alone to capture ... deceptive content as a defence against allowing people to monetise that content reflects unrealistic expectations for what the tool can do.”