Chinese web users get creative to dodge Covid censorship

WHO estimates that Covid killed some 15 million in 2020-21

Stuck at home, many of the city’s 25 million residents have taken to social media to vent fury over food shortages and spartan quarantine conditions.

Charlie Smith, co-founder of censorship monitoring website GreatFire.org, said the Shanghai lockdown had become “too big of an issue to be able to completely censor”.

Hell-bent on getting their messages out, web users were turning to tricks such as flipping images and using wordplay, he said, using a pseudonym due to the sensitivity of his work.

In one example, censors deleted a popular hashtag on the Weibo social media platform quoting the first line of China’s national anthem: “Arise, those who refuse to be slaves.”

The line was being shared alongside a torrent of anti-lockdown fury.

Others hijacked a hashtag about American human rights failings to make tongue-in-cheek barbs about home confinement in China.

In a similar attempt, netizens rallied to push Orwell’s fiction 1984 to the top of a list of popular titles on the Douban ratings site, before it was blocked.

Covid-19 now endemic in Hong Kong, health adviser says

Censors also raced to kill off memes and hashtags based on a government official who previously said foreign journalists were “secretly loving” the fact they had safely seen out the pandemic in China.

Users then devised a series of oblique puns on that quote, eventually prompting censors to block the hashtag La La Land.

Last month the internet police floundered in quashing viral video Voices of April that featured stories from distressed Shanghai residents in lockdown.

Web users rapidly re-edited and shared the six-minute clip to outrun largely automated screening software, which struggled for hours to identify the different versions.

One frustrated Shanghai local said netizens shared the various formats “to make a point” even though each post vanished within minutes.

“It was us against the AI,” the resident said, requesting anonymity.

People in Shanghai have become more “willing to pay the price” for airing critical views, said Luwei Rose Luqiu, an assistant professor at Hong Kong Baptist University.

The “hardship, discontent and anger” they have endured in lockdown have “far outweighed the fear” of punishment for posting sensitive content, she said.

Hong Kong questions costs of Covid-19 restrictions on mental health, livelihoods

Gao Ming, 46, said he received calls from police last month telling him to delete anti-lockdown posts on Twitter and Facebook, which are blocked in the mainland.

But the public relations professional has so far refused, saying he is “against censorship” and wants to spread debate about China’s Covid strategy.

“I’m totally against the current policy,” he said, arguing that the lockdown has caused unnecessary deaths by cutting access to regular medical care.

Top Chinese leaders vowed at a meeting on Thursday to stick “unwaveringly” to zero-Covid and “resolutely fight against all words and deeds that distort, question or reject our nation’s disease control policies”.

State media has played up the positives and “sidelined private difficulties”, said a Beijing-based journalism professor who requested anonymity.

The approach has created “two Shanghais”, where official portrayals contrast sharply with what people view online, the professor added.

Online outrage is unlikely to prompt the Communist Party to relax its hardline approach, particularly with the country’s president so invested in zero-Covid, said Yaqiu Wang, senior China researcher at Human Rights Watch.

“It’s harder for the government to walk back when it becomes an ideological issue that’s attached to Xi Jinping personally,” she said.