Face Off: Should Hong Kong universities allow students to enrol without choosing a major?

Published: 
Listen to this article

Each week, two readers discuss a hot topic in a parliamentary-style debate that doesn’t necessarily reflect their personal viewpoints

Young Post Readers |
Published: 
Comment

Latest Articles

Australian woman found guilty of triple murder via poisonous mushrooms

Singapore universities soar, better option for Chinese students than US: report

5 chair yoga poses to help you stretch anywhere

More than 80 people dead, many missing in Texas floods

Hong Kong tenants endure 40 degree heat in substandard housing

IB 2025: 31 Hong Kong students achieve top scores despite tough maths exam

Is it reasonable to expect that teenagers know what they want to study? Photo: Shutterstock

If you are interested in joining future Face Off debates, fill out this form to submit your application.

For: Ansley Au Tsz-ying, 17, King Ling College

Ansley Au argues that flexibility is key to a modern education system. Photo: Handout

In many universities, students must make the difficult decision of choosing a major before entering. This approach should be updated for students to enjoy more flexibility.

The traditional approach often confines students to a rigid path, forcing them to declare a focus of study before entering university. Allowing students to enrol without a predetermined major will enable them to explore various disciplines and discover their passions, cultivating a well-rounded education.

Many US universities allow students to enrol without declaring a major, and they are more likely to explore multiple fields before settling on a major. They will be more satisfied with their academic experience if they explore many different interests.

Not needing a predetermined programme promotes personal development. Students will have the freedom to evolve and explore a diverse range of disciplines. For example, taking courses in the humanities, social sciences and arts can provide a better understanding of the modern world.

Most students face immense pressure when choosing a major before they start university, which often results in poor decision-making. They might feel rushed and could misunderstand the major requirements. They may not even be sure of their own strengths and interests yet. This could lead to high dropout rates and dissatisfaction. The flexibility of choosing a major after entering university alleviates anxiety, as students can take time to make informed choices about their future.

Many jobs, such as app developers and social media managers, did not exist until recent years, so students need to learn flexibility and a range of skills. Allowing them to explore various subjects better equips them for the modern job market.

Other universities around the globe allow students to discover their passions before committing to a specific major. For example, the University of California, Berkeley – a top school in the US – allows students to enter as “undeclared”.

Some argue that this may lead to a lack of focus, but exploration is not the same as indecision. In fact, those who engage in a diverse range of courses can find their interests more effectively and develop a clearer sense of purpose.

All in all, allowing students to enter university without choosing a programme will enhance flexibility and develop a more modern and holistic education system.

What should I study in university: my passion or a subject that makes money?

Against: Kelvin Au Kan-ming, 17, GCCITKD Lau Pak Lok Secondary School

Kelvin Au explains the logic behind having a clear path through university. Photo: Handout

Most Hong Kong universities require students to choose a programme prior to enrolling. This gives them a clear path to follow. If students join without a programme, not only might they feel lost and waste time and money, but it also creates other problems for universities.

Students without a major might not know what to study and could end up taking random courses. For instance, a student might take art, science and history classes without a clear goal, making them feel confused and unmotivated. They might not work hard because they do not see a purpose.

If universities require a programme, students can work within a framework towards a clear endpoint. They will study subjects that benefit their future careers. Having a purpose in their studies also keeps students engaged.

Wasting money is also a by-product of an unclear university path. Attending university is expensive already, and enrolling without a programme wastes time and money. If students take classes that do not count towards a degree, they are pouring money down the drain. Moreover, those who procrastinate in choosing a programme might have to complete additional semesters to graduate on time. Choosing a programme early saves money and helps students graduate with their peers.

Furthermore, students without programmes might delay their careers, putting them at a disadvantage when looking for jobs. If someone wants to be a doctor, they need to take specific courses. If they wait to choose, they start their career later and have to compete with more established peers.

It is also worth noting that universities may face challenges when students do not declare their majors. Departments need to know how many students are in each programme to allocate resources, and if students delay this decision, this could affect the institution’s planning and budget.

Some might argue that students have more freedom to explore if they do not choose a major when they enrol in a university. However, this exploration can happen in secondary school through courses, hobbies and clubs prior to university. Universities can also guide students without letting them enrol undecided. In this way, students can still explore but with a clear path.

By requiring students to choose a programme, universities help them succeed and make their futures brighter.

Sign up for the YP Teachers Newsletter
Get updates for teachers sent directly to your inbox
By registering, you agree to our T&C and Privacy Policy
Comment