The Lens: To fix gender disparity in organ donors, debunk misconceptions and promote altruism

Neal Chau Heung-yan, 14, CNEC Christian College

The gender disparity in organ donation is a complex issue with various factors contributing to it.

One perspective suggests that from a religious standpoint, most religions encourage individuals to extend love and help to others, akin to how they would treat themselves. Given that studies have shown women are more likely to be religious than men are, it is plausible to assume that women may exhibit a greater inclination towards aiding their fellow human beings, including being more open to the idea of organ donation.

Another factor to consider is the societal perception of men as primary breadwinners. Men are often expected to be the financial providers for their families, which can lead to them prioritising their own health. As a result, they may be less likely to consider organ donation which could compromise their ability to fulfil their financial responsibilities.

To address this kind of gender disparity, one potential solution is for the government to implement incentives for organ donors. By offering rewards to individuals who choose to donate their organs, it could create stronger motivation for men to participate.

A comprehensive approach should involve raising awareness about the importance of organ donation, debunking all kinds of misconceptions and promoting a culture of altruism. Education along with public campaigns can play a crucial role in changing societal norms and perceptions surrounding organ donation.

Ultimately, it is important to encourage both men and women to embrace organ donation as an opportunity to save lives.

Read last week’s news snippet here

The Singaporean government has decided to remove a 34-year ban on pet cats in public housing. Animal lovers have praised this as a fair move since small dog breeds have been allowed all along. Some cat owners say they were not even aware of the rule change because the ban on cats was not actively enforced before.

Currently, 62 breeds of small dogs, birds and fish are allowed in public housing, but cats are banned completely – and cat lovers say this is unfair.

The ban on pet cats in public housing flats began in 1989 because they are “generally difficult to contain within the flat”, as per the Housing Development Board’s (HDB) website. About 80 per cent of Singaporeans live in public housing.

The proposed changes will come into effect in the later part of 2024. Pet cats will need to be microchipped and licensed. Two cats will be allowed for each HDB flat, while three cats will be allowed for a private residence.

Thenuga Vijakumar, who is the president of the Cat Welfare Society, noted: “Responsible pet cat owners deserve to own their cats without fear of scrutiny if they adhere to the conditions of responsible ownership and licensing. This will put them on par with dog owners who have had the benefit of regulations.”

However, some public housing residents are worried about having cats on their estate, citing concerns such as cleanliness.

“I feel quite scared because ... even if the HDB only allows two cats, it’s unclear how many cats people will actually keep in their flats,” said a writer.

Animal advocates want officials to also require sterilisation to stop people from breeding cats for sale and to curb smell and noise issues.
Staff writers

• Why did the Singaporean government ban people living in public housing from keeping cats? Do you agree with their reasoning?

• Do you support the lift of the ban? What impact could it have on the residents and the feline animals?