National security law: New ESF school guidelines say the classroom is 'not a safe space' for debate on Hong Kong politics
- The document says that teachers don't have to refrain from discussing local and mainland politics in the classroom, but that they should remain objective and not voice their views
- The guide suggests that if students say they support the anti-government protests, teachers should explain their views may be interpreted as illegal
Hong Kong’s new national security law has prompted the creation of a set of guidelines for teachers at the English Schools Foundation. Photo: SCMP/ Felix WongNew guidelines released by the English Schools foundation state that while sensitive local or mainland political issues are not off-limits in the classroom, and students should be taught to think critically, the classroom is "not a safe space" for discussions or debate.
The document also said that teachers should not express their views on local politics in the classroom or advocate activities that could undermine the Hong Kong or central governments’ authority.
Titled “The National Security Law – A Guide for Teachers of Global Politics and Global Citizenship”, the internal 15-page document concludes: “Be balanced, be objective, don’t express your own views about local politics”.
While the Education Bureau has yet to issue detailed guidelines to schools about the law, the ESF confirmed they distributed the guide “simply for internal discussion around the new laws from an educational perspective”.
Press freedom under threat in Hong Kong
ESF chief executive Belinda Greer told the SCMP last month that the group was looking into its secondary curriculum to ensure staff “feel safe” teaching in their usual way following the imposition of the security law.
“Is the classroom a ‘safe space’ for debate and discussion? No,” the ESF document reads. “In theory, it should be a safe space to discuss anything. But in reality, it is not."
“Students and their families have the full range of backgrounds and political opinions. What we do and talk about in class will be discussed with families and friends outside the classroom. Always be aware of how what you are teaching could be interpreted/misinterpreted by others, out of context,” the document added.
The guide – while telling teachers not to shy away from sensitive issues related to Hong Kong or mainland Chinese politics in class, as any avoidance would be “educationally inauthentic” – urged them to handle these discussions with “extreme care, sensitivity and skill”.
A review of the first month under the national security law
“If they don’t learn about these issues properly in our classrooms, they may learn about them from less reliable and unbalanced sources such as social media,” the guide said.
Teachers were also asked not to advocate for Hong Kong independence, illegal anti-government protests or any activity that sought to undermine the authority of either the central or Hong Kong governments.
Four hypothetical scenarios in classrooms were cited, including one in which a student expresses support for illegal protests and is highly critical of the government.
The guideline suggests teachers explain calmly to the student that his or her views might be interpreted as illegal and that there are multiple perspectives on the issue.
ESF chief executive Belinda Greer told the Post last month the group was looking into its curriculum to ensure staff ‘feel safe’ teaching. Photo: Handout
Another scenario involved students asking the teachers’ views on sensitive local political issues such as whether the anti-extradition bill protests were justified.
“Don’t be drawn into explicitly expressing your views. Remind students that illegal protests, violence and undermining government authority are illegal,” the guide said, adding teachers should present arguments from multiple perspectives.
In a reply to the SCMP on Thursday, Greer said the school operator would “remain politically neutral and continue to abide by the laws of the land”.
“As teachers of global politics and global citizenship, we are required to talk about political issues/concepts in our curriculum, including the Basic Law of Hong Kong and current affairs,” she added.
EDB says Liberal Studies changes are not censorship
“As educators, it never has been, and never should be, our role to influence students’ political opinions. Our role is to teach students how to think critically, understand and tolerate multiple perspectives, research widely and from reliable sources, and analyse information and reach evidence-based conclusions.”
A senior secondary student at one ESF school said she was worried that the new law and guidelines would narrow the room for discussion in classrooms.
“[We] don’t like the idea of being censored … We are in this new age where all teenagers are hyper-political,” said the student, who asked to remain anonymous.
5 ways the national security law has affected Hong Kong
A secondary schoolteacher formerly with ESF, and now working at another international school in Hong Kong, also believed the content of the guide was “quite responsible”.
“We have children of police as well as children of protesters, so we were always very aware not to demonise one side or the other,” he said.
He noted, however, that he also believed the national security law would likely restrict some discussions in classrooms.
“I would consider [resigning] if teachers started to get arrested,” he said. “If these laws fundamentally destroyed Hongkongers’ lives – which I am hopeful they will not – then that would also be the time for my family to move.”