LettersRigid quotas will undercut Hong Kong’s ride-hailing service providers
Readers discuss the effort to regulate ride-hailing, how to best address the city’s mental health crisis, and potential problems linked to the Fanling Bypass
Regarding quotas, there appears to be a disconnect between policy direction and public sentiment. Proponents argue limits ensure market stability, yet I observe no grass-roots demand for such restrictions. In three years, no passenger has ever told me there are too many ride-hailing cars. What they do tell me is how grateful they are to get home safely – whether it’s after a late night in Central when the MTR has closed or during heavy rainstorms. That sense of safety and reliability is what they value most.
On licensing implementation, the details matter. If the government proceeds with limitations, establishing fair and transparent eligibility processes becomes critical. An estimated 30,000 drivers operate, many for years with clean records. These existing drivers, who have built livelihoods around this work, deserve prioritisation in any transition framework.
Moreover, in the current economic climate where employment uncertainty remains high and many families struggle with rising costs, it seems counterintuitive for the government to restrict opportunities that allow people to earn flexible income. If procedures become administratively complex or fees prohibitively high, regulations risk excluding the populations this service has empowered.