Advertisement
Letters
Readers discuss the everyday impacts of the city’s dual water supply system, and the importance of reaching socially withdrawn young people.
Readers discuss how generative AI works, and a new scheme for hiring native English-speaking teachers.
Readers discuss the necessity of enforceable laws for rivers, Hong Kong’s pivot to Central Asia, and Chinese tourists’ safety fears.
Readers discuss the Xi-Putin meeting, Christian concerns about files on alleged UFOs, and AI chatbots.
Advertisement
Readers discuss the car-centric culture driving infrastructure projects, space mission outcomes, and the World Cup.
Readers discuss how philanthropy can respond to Asia’s climate challenges, the mismatch between Hong Kong’s ride-hailing cap and the reality of gig work, and the data centre rush.
Readers discuss how to make the blockade costly for Washington, the Power of Siberia 2 pipeline, and the success of a grass-roots film.
Readers discuss a proposed ranking system for the civil service, opportunities in Central Asia, and the Ebola threat.
Readers discuss how AI intensifies a culture of performance encouraged by social media, and change in Hong Kong’s Central district.
Readers discuss a gap in Hong Kong’s governance, collective liability for smoking on construction sites, and the environmental responsibility of event organisers.
Readers discuss how to ensure Hong Kong’s megaproject delivers, the ride-hailing licence fee, and how the city can go big on aerospace.
Readers discuss digital asset audits, the danger of setting a ride-hailing cap, and the bigger picture on allowing dogs in restaurants.
Readers discuss a flexible alternative to the proposed quota, why some consumers prefer ride-hailing, and US military killings in the Caribbean Sea.
Readers discuss the urgency of assessing aged drivers’ abilities, raising children capable of questioning AI, and seafood safety.
Readers discuss how holistic management can promote both conservation and ecotourism, and Singapore’s new anti-bullying measures.
Readers discuss recent figures on overseas talent, and the new rules for dog-friendly restaurants in Hong Kong.
Readers discuss who holds the strongest cards in China-US ties, why Hong Kong should abandon the US dollar peg, and the merits of Indonesia’s social programmes.
Readers highlight Canada’s open, responsible and respectful diplomacy, and warn against lifting Hong Kong’s ban on electric mobility devices.
Readers discuss the nuanced difference between a medical blunder and a medical complication, AI and mental health, and the IMF’s advice to Hong Kong.
Readers call for the introduction of professional career coaching, a flexible ride-hailing framework, and more creativity for local restaurants.
Readers discuss a potential positive consequence of Middle East volatility, the Russian leader’s coming visit to Beijing, and AI’s impact on China’s real economy.
Readers call for stronger systemic defences as technology evolves, and no let-up in efforts to combat illegal betting ahead of the World Cup.
Readers discuss survey findings highlighting adverse impact on attention and critical thinking, and the ongoing review of the city’s sexual offence laws.
Readers discuss ways to build a sense of belonging for talent retention, plans to extend MTR South Island line, and a teacher’s role in supporting mental health.
Readers call on Hong Kong schools to balance setting boundaries with engagement, praise a local production of Bizet’s Carmen, and voice a wish for a better future.
Readers discuss the value of the International Organisation for Mediation, an unintended problem with contactless lift sensors, and Iran’s right to secure its own survival.
Readers discuss the need for job creation to happen in tandem with flat building, the value of the Fanling Bypass, and the dangers of AI content.
Readers discuss the coming Xi-Trump summit in Beijing, and Iran’s attempt to control the Strait of Hormuz.
Readers discuss shortfalls in Kai Tak Stadium’s operation, Hong Kong’s unfulfilled promise to protect the rights of same-sex couples, and the penalty for a lawmaker’s traffic offence.
