Advertisement
Hong Kong society
OpinionLetters

LettersStart early, connect deeply: addressing Gen Z’s mental health crisis

Readers discuss how Hong Kong should respond to a survey on depression among the youth, and campaigns against sexual harassment for young people

3-MIN READ3-MIN
Listen
A recent survey found 44 per cent of Gen Z respondents reported moderate to severe depression. Photo: Jonathan Wong
Letters
Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at [email protected] or filling in this Google form. Submissions should not exceed 400 words
The Mental Health Association of Hong Kong (MAIHK) and Chinese University of Hong Kong’s (CUHK) latest survey is a wake-up call: 43.5 per cent of Gen Z respondents reported moderate to severe depression. Researchers also found a positive correlation between screen time and depression and anxiety scores, echoing Jonathan Haidt’s warning in The Anxious Generation that a phone-based childhood may be displacing the face-to-face relationships young people need to thrive.

We echo MAIHK’s call for compulsory mental health courses at universities. Just Feel and CUHK lecturer Dr Cho Man-kit have co-created a credit-bearing general education course on compassionate communication offered at Lee Woo Sing College, CUHK. Yet universities alone cannot solve a problem that often begins much earlier. The World Health Organization notes that one in seven adolescents experiences a mental disorder, and half of all such conditions emerge by age 14. Prevention must therefore begin long before university.

Advertisement

This is why family and school connectedness matter so much. Hong Kong’s Education Bureau has highlighted these as among the most critical protective factors for student mental health. Yet the MHAHK survey also found that AI assistants have become the sixth most common help-seeking option, and that those who turn to AI show comparatively higher depression scores. When young people seek connection from algorithms rather than people, it signals that something in our schools and families has fallen short.

Our experience with more than 65 partner schools suggests that isolated lessons are not enough. What makes a difference is a whole-school approach that supports teachers, engages parents and builds a culture where students feel safe to express feelings, build, sustain and repair relationships, and seek help.

Advertisement

A whole-school approach works precisely because it does not leave individual adults to figure it out alone. When teachers and parents are supported to practise these skills in everyday interactions, students experience the co-regulation, consistency and safety they need to grow. Without this foundation, even the most well-meaning adult can inadvertently push young people further away. We risk doing harm with good hearts.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x