LettersHong Kong’s civil servants shouldn’t be target of misplaced frustrations

Readers discuss a suggestion to cut or freeze civil servants’ pay, a challenge in telling good Hong Kong stories, our addiction to smartphones, and holding Israel to account for the Gaza war

3-MIN READ3-MIN

The end of the work day at Hong Kong’s government offices in Admiralty on June 4. Photo: Edmond So

Published: 11:30am, 11 Dec 2024

Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at [email protected] or filling in this Google form. Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification

I am writing in response to the recent suggestion by economist Simon Lee Siu-po that the Hong Kong government could impose salary cuts or freezes on civil servants due to this year’s HK$100 billion (US$12.85 billion) deficit (“Lower land prices, civil service pay freeze among options to tackle Hong Kong deficit, experts say”, December 4). In a radio interview, Mr Lee suggested a salary cut of around 8-10 per cent across the board.

As a secondary school teacher whose salary is determined by the Civil Service Bureau’s Master Pay Scale system, I find this proposal particularly troubling. It seems that whenever there is a deficit, civil servants, including teachers, are unfairly targeted and penalised. We work tirelessly and with dedication, yet we are unjustly blamed for the fiscal shortfalls, which are beyond our control. What justification is there for holding us accountable for this financial predicament? Additionally, our salaries have not kept pace with the high cost of living in Hong Kong.

Why not eliminate tax breaks instead of targeting civil servants? The perception of civil servants as overcompensated is misguided. For instance, an assistant tax officer’s starting salary is approximately HK$17,000, an appropriate remuneration for a job with a stressful workload.