Advertisement
LettersWhy Hong Kong universities should let students learn with ChatGPT
- Readers discuss an interim ban on the chatbot, and an obscure acronym on the Hong Kong rescue team’s uniform
2-MIN READ2-MIN
Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at [email protected] or filling in this Google form. Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification.
We are writing, with a little assistance from ChatGPT, in response to the recent decision by the University of Hong Kong to temporarily ban the use of this AI-based chatbot for coursework and assessment. While we acknowledge the concern over plagiarism and understand the university’s honour code, we believe the ban is unnecessary and unreasonable.
The university seems to have assumed that students would ask the chatbot to write full essays and submit them as their own work. For these scenarios, the university’s existing guidelines against plagiarism would suffice to warn those who intend to claim others’ work as their own. However, the university has overlooked other legitimate uses of ChatGPT.
For example, the chatbot can help students brainstorm and generate ideas for a project, assess the quality of an argument in a draft essay, and identify grammatical and lexical errors while making suggestions on how to improve. None of these uses would constitute plagiarism if the students fully acknowledge them.
Select Voice
Select Speed
1x
AI-generated voice