Advertisement
LettersHong Kong has a national security law, universal suffrage should be next
- The enactment of the national security law should convince Beijing that the conditions are ideal for launching the political reform process
2-MIN READ2-MIN
Some say Hong Kong is the “new Berlin”, without specifying whether it’s the eastern or the western half; some say we resemble Manchuria during the Russo-Japanese war, fought over by superpowers eyeing its rich resources. Whichever allusion is used to interpret the current situation, one must not forget these wars came to an end. Order was ultimately restored.
The China-US hostility will end one day and order in this city will also be restored. But one would be a fool to expect things to “go back to normal”, like they were in the past 23 years. The old arrangements drafted 30 years ago are deemed unfit for this unprecedented international situation, so what officials call a “new constitutional order”, is set to correct it. The city has had a taste of what this new order is like after the enactment of the national security law.
But, however different the new from the old, the Basic Law still serves as the framework. Apart from outlining the powers of the authorities, it also ratifies Beijing’s promise of “universal suffrage” for the selection of chief executive.
I surely am not alone in continuing to believe in this solemn promise. In an article for Ming Pao, Terrence Lin and Liang Junjie advocated for the long-delayed political reform. They argued that, after the enactment of national security law, the “one country” principle is stronger than ever, so the central government has no excuse to delay or avoid its promise of universal suffrage.
Select Voice
Select Speed
1x
AI-generated voice