Advertisement

Is Pakistan’s intelligence agency using ‘intimidating’ scare tactics on judges to sway rulings?

  • A letter by senior judges on the High Court alleges the nation’s intelligence agency had used intimidation and torture to sway their rulings
  • The Supreme Court will investigate the judges’ letter and its allegations, with hearings set to begin on April 29

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
0
Pakistani security officials stand guard outside the Islamabad Supreme Court. A letter signed by the six senior judges of the Islamabad High Court outlined the judges’ concerns regarding the widespread use of “intimidating” tactics by the Inter-Services Intelligence, the country’s primary intelligence agency, to influence judicial verdicts, particularly in political cases. Photo: EPA-EFE
A letter by senior judges in Pakistan has sent shock waves through the country as it alleged that the nation’s powerful intelligence agency had used intimidation tactics and torture to sway their rulings, including in cases against former prime minister Imran Khan – allegations that the Supreme Court will soon investigate.

The letter – signed by the six senior judges of the Islamabad High Court and addressed to the nation’s Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa – outlined the judges’ concerns regarding the widespread use of “intimidating” tactics by the Inter-Services Intelligence, the country’s primary intelligence agency, to influence judicial verdicts, particularly in political cases.

“This letter of the judges represents a significant challenge to the existing state of affairs in the country, where the military establishment effectively holds sway, relegating the democratic government to a symbolic role,” Tauseef Ahmed Khan, a political commentator and rights activist, told This Week in Asia.

Lawyer and supporters of former PM Imran Khan’s party outside the Islamabad Supreme Court. Khan has faced a series of legal challenges that he accused the military establishment of orchestrating. Photo: EPA-EFE
Lawyer and supporters of former PM Imran Khan’s party outside the Islamabad Supreme Court. Khan has faced a series of legal challenges that he accused the military establishment of orchestrating. Photo: EPA-EFE

The 12-page letter, signed on March 25 and released to the public a few days later, outlined a number of allegations, including the installation of hidden cameras within the bedrooms of judges and threats of dire consequences if certain verdicts were not handed down.

It cited a 2020 appeal against Pakistan’s former leader Imran Khan in which two judges on the three-member panel said the case against him was not maintainable. The letter alleged that intelligence operatives had pressured the judges into changing their opinions by threatening their friends and family, leading them to seek additional security protections.

It also said men claiming to be intelligence operatives had kidnapped one of the judge’s brother-in-law, and tortured him into making allegations against the judge that would lead to his resignation. The court heard the appeal against Khan and eventually ruled against him.

Khan has faced a series of legal challenges that he accused the military establishment of orchestrating. In February, he was sentenced to 10 years in prison for revealing state secrets, in addition to a 14-year sentence for the illegal sale of state gifts.

The Supreme Court has announced it would take suo moto (of its own volition) action to investigate the judges’ letter and its allegations, with hearings set to begin on April 29.

Advertisement