bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

paywallTypes

createdDate

publishedDate

sponsorType

urlAlias

moreOnThisArticles

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

articleSpeeches

socialHeadline

headline

images

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

sponsor

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Marianne Hanson

Israel’s avowed goal in the Middle East war is to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Yet the double standard associated with this is hardly sustainable in the long run.
The worst-kept secret in the world of nuclear politics is that Israel possesses a formidable arsenal of nuclear weapons. It began developing these in the 1950s and reached a fully operational capability by the late 1960s.
Although Israel refuses to confirm or deny this fact, arms control organisations have assessed that the country has some 80 to 90 nuclear weapons.
In recent days, Iran targeted Israel’s nuclear facility in the southern town of Dimona, injuring more than 100 people. The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) called for restraint to avoid a “nuclear accident”.

Shrouded in secrecy
There is much evidence to support the existence of Israel’s arsenal.
In 1963, then deputy defence minister Shimon Peres famously stated Israel would not be the first to “introduce” nuclear weapons to the Middle East. What this actually meant was spelled out a few years later by the Israeli ambassador to the United States. For a weapon to be “introduced”, he said, it needed to be tested and publicly declared. Merely possessing them did not constitute introducing them.
Several whistle-blower accounts, intelligence reports and satellite imagery confirm the extent of the Israeli programme and its capabilities.
More recently, Amichai Eliyahu, a far-right minister in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government, alluded to using nuclear weapons in Gaza – a tacit acknowledgement of Israel’s capabilities. He was later reprimanded by Netanyahu.
And in 2024, Avigdor Lieberman, a former defence and foreign minister, threatened to “use all the means at our disposal” to prevent an Iranian nuclear weapon. He added: “It should be clear at this stage it is not possible to prevent nuclear weapons from Iran by conventional means.”
It is important to remember that Israel not only developed its nuclear weapons in secret – employing subterfuge, misleading claims and even the suspected theft of bomb-grade nuclear material from the US – it has also rejected international inspections of its facilities and refused to join the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. This treaty has been signed by almost every state in the world.

Concerns over Iran
Iran, meanwhile, has never had a nuclear weapon, though its programme has been the source of international concern for more than a decade.
In 2015, Iran signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (also known as the Iran nuclear deal) with the US, Russia, China, France, the United Kingdom and Germany, which imposed restrictions on its nuclear programme in return for sanctions relief. This included inspections by IAEA monitors.
However, US President Donald Trump scuppered the plan in 2018. Since then, Iran has enriched uranium to levels well above those needed for its energy programme. And last year, the IAEA said Iran was non-compliant with its nuclear non-proliferation obligations for failing to provide full answers about its programme.
But since the current war began, US and international officials have confirmed that Iran was not close to developing a nuclear weapon and did not pose an imminent nuclear threat to the US or Israel.
In short, there is no truth to the claim, made for almost 40 years by Israel, that Iran is “weeks away” from acquiring the bomb. The IAEA made clear two years ago that a nuclear weapon requires “many other things independently from the production of the fissile material”.
Getting close to nuclear threshold status, but stopping short of developing an actual bomb, likely provides a fallback position for Iran. If Iran were to feel pushed or threatened, it could, in time, accelerate its energy programme towards a weapons programme. Or it could use this enriched uranium as leverage in negotiations with the US.

Nuclear powers must show restraint
This brings us back to a major question: can double standards about who can and cannot develop a nuclear weapon be sustained indefinitely?
Israel’s nuclear arsenal has been tacitly accepted by the West, implying there are “right hands” and “wrong hands” for nuclear weapons. But this is a risky and ultimately unsustainable position.
As Australia’s Canberra Commission noted in 1996, as long as any one state has nuclear weapons, other states will want them, too.
This is precisely why many states voted in 2017 to adopt the UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. The treaty’s purpose is to make the possession, threat and use of nuclear weapons illegitimate for all states, not just for some, on the basis of international humanitarian law.
Signed by 99 states so far, the treaty recognises that nuclear weapons promise massive destruction to civilians and combatants alike, and that even a “small” nuclear war will cause catastrophic damage.
At the end of the day, a consistent approach to nuclear weapons is more likely to prevent nuclear proliferation (by Iran or other states) than the current mess, where some states are tacitly permitted to have these weapons (and wage war on others), while other countries are not.
It is possible we are at a tipping point when it comes to nuclear proliferation, with some countries suspected of wanting to develop nuclear weapon capabilities. This includes US allies South Korea and Japan.
Are the nuclear weapons states ultimately willing to accept the UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons and disarm in the interest of global peace and security? If they don’t, then the current trajectory of keeping one’s own nuclear weapons and waging war against states that don’t have them will only weaken an already crumbling rules-based international order.
Marianne Hanson is Associate Professor of International Relations at The University of Queensland in Australia. This article was first published by The Conversation.




Regional diplomats gather in Pakistan for talks to end Iran war

Jiang Xueqin, the viral ‘prophet’ predicting the world’s fate from a Beijing classroom

Australia’s Karratha LNG plant closed after cyclone amid fuel shortages

Finance chief says Hong Kong remains stable as oil prices surge amid Mideast turmoil

US-Israel war on Iran

One rule for Israel and another for Iran risks nuclear disaster

Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu points to a red line he has drawn on a graphic representing an Iranian nuclear bomb as he addresses the UN in 2012. Photo: Reuters

People inspect the site of an Iranian missile strike in Dimona, Israel, on Sunday. More than 100 people were injured in the attack. Photo: AFP

An overview of the tunnel complex at Pickaxe Mountain near the Natanz nuclear complex in Iran on March 7. Photo: Vantor via AP

A portrait of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is seen pasted on the wall of a kindergarten that was damaged in an Iranian missile strike in Dimona on Sunday. Photo: AFP

Iran war nears 3-front tipping point as Gulf energy hubs burn

Smoke and fire rise near the South Pars gas field following an attack amid the US-Israeli war on Iran, on Wednesday. Photo: Reuters

Israeli troops and tanks are seen at a staging area in northern Israel near the border with Lebanon on Wednesday. Photo: Xinhua

An oil tanker navigates the Red Sea near the entrance of the Suez Canal on March 11. Photo: Xinhua

A page on the Marine Traffic website shows commercial marine traffic on the edge of the Strait of Hormuz near the Iranian coast earlier this month. Photo: AFP/Getty Images/TNS

Houthi security forces stand guard during an anti-Israel and anti-US rally in Sanaa, Yemen. Photo: AFP/Getty Images/TNS

Smoke rises following an Israeli bombardment on southern Lebanon near the border on Wednesday. Photo: AFP

In Iran war debut, South Korea’s cut-price Patriot outshines US interceptors

A Cheongung-II surface-to-air missile is launched towards a simulated target during a drill in 2024. Photo: South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff

Visitors look at the KM-SAM Cheongung missile system during the Seoul International Aerospace and Defence Exhibition in October last year. Photo: AFP

An Emirates aircraft flies past plumes of smoke from a fire caused by a drone strike near Dubai International Airport in the UAE on March 16. Photo: AFP

Kang Hoon-sik, the presidential chief of staff, speaks to the media in Seoul, South Korea, on Wednesday. Photo: Yonhap/EPA

Interceptor missiles launched by the Qatari Armed Forces explode in the sky over Doha on Wednesday. Photo: dpa

Launch tubes of Cheongung surface-to-air missile system are seen at Hanwha Aerospace factory in Changwon in 2024. Photo: AFP

South Korean K9 Thunder 155mm self-propelled Howitzers fire during a live-fire drill in 2011. Photo: Dong-a Ilbo/AFP

Saudi Arabia-Pakistan pact sends nuclear umbrella signal over Israel’s attack on Qatar

A Pakistani-made Shaheen-III missile, which can carry nuclear warheads, on display during a military parade in Islamabad in 2018. Photo: AP

Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif (left) embraces Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman after signing a defence pact in Riyadh on Wednesday. Photo: AP

A building damaged by an Israeli attack on Hamas leaders in Doha, Qatar, on September 9. Photo: Reuters

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan (centre) and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian (centre, standing) attending the emergency Arab-Islamic summit on Monday to discuss the Israeli attack on Qatar in Doha. Photo: EPA

This Week in Asia

Opinion

Asia Opinion

News

Asia

Israel is believed to have some 80 to 90 nuclear weapons. Iran has none. Such double standards are unsustainable


Israel is believed to have some 80 to 90 nuclear weapons. Iran has none. Such double standards are unsustainable.


Israel

Iran

War and conflict

Nuclear weapons and intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs)

Israel-Iran conflict

United States

Australia

Donald Trump

Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)


.css-1c6uqr6{color:inherit;font-weight:inherit;font-size:inherit;font-family:inherit;line-height:inherit;overflow-wrap:break-word;}Israel is believed to have some 80 to 90 nuclear weapons. Iran has none. Such double standards are unsustainable

Shrouded in secrecy

Israel is believed to have some 80 to 90 nuclear weapons. Iran has none. Such double standards are unsustainable