Advertisement
US President Donald Trump meets China's President Xi Jinping at a G20 summit in Japan last year. Photo: Reuters
Middle powers worried that America’s leadership within the international order will succumb to China’s strong-arm tactics abroad should take care not to underestimate Washington’s resilience.
Though US leadership continues to face considerable competition from China, recent events suggest America might remain the nation most likely to simultaneously check Beijing’s revisionist impulses and help maintain key aspects of the current international system, such as the rule of law, freedom of navigation, and credible multilateral institutions.

While America is seen as increasingly weak and irresponsible both domestically and internationally, these perceptions could change. As demonstrated by the world’s mounting interest in “decoupling” from China, Beijing’s efforts to establish a legitimate, parallel set of international norms and institutions are beginning to falter. Other geopolitical heavyweights have also failed to make up for the recent absence of a unifying presence on the world stage.

On the other hand, perceptions of an accelerating power transition from the US to China could also be self-perpetuating. Global news headlines are saturated with stories of America’s bungled Covid-19 response and looming Depression-level economic downturn, leaving leaders across Asia and Europe unsure about the country’s future.

Chinese President Xi Jinping is seen on a giant screen on the facade of a shopping centre in Beijing. Photo: Reuters
Chinese President Xi Jinping is seen on a giant screen on the facade of a shopping centre in Beijing. Photo: Reuters

Cautious leadership now, accentuated by fear of being caught in the rip tides of a potential cold war between the US and China, might mean missing out on a rare opportunity to take advantage of Beijing’s own recent setbacks.

This could allow the Communist Party to recover some of the footing it has lost in recent months, and give President Xi Jinping unnecessary latitude to continue exerting his confrontational foreign policy unopposed.
Advertisement