Navigating the evolving risks in the real estate and hospitality industries
- Insurance must be viewed within the wider context of enterprise risk management, encompassing risk mitigation measures that reduce the threat to people and property, says Edward Farrelly of Marsh
Recent events in Hong Kong have highlighted risks arising from social unrest. Property owners in affected areas are undoubtedly reviewing their insurance coverage, particularly “SRCC” clauses, relating to strikes, riots and civil commotion. This will generally cover property damage and public liability under these situations.
However, insured parties can also be affected by what happens in their immediate surroundings, as businesses around Admiralty can testify. Even with minor damage or a complete lack of physical impact, large losses of revenue can be incurred. Non-damage business interruption insurance policies can therefore be an important consideration for a business. Certain risks, such as loss of attraction, are not normally covered by traditional insurance, but they can be supplemented through innovative solutions.
All of this points to a need for companies to know their real risks, and adequately put measures in place to protect themselves and their stakeholders. Real estate owners, managers and occupiers must become aware of the risk presented not only by social unrest, but also political violence and terrorism. Offices, shopping malls, and hotels in prime areas of Hong Kong attract high profile tenants and generate high volumes of foot traffic, increasing the risk profile.
Generally speaking Hong Kong is perceived to be a safe and welcoming city, both on a personal level – witness the number of tourists – and also in terms of doing business.
The Lloyds City Risk Index (the LCRI) reinforces this view. To measure the potential financial impact of catastrophes, the LCRI estimates cities’ GDP at risk. In 2018 it categorised Hong Kong as being only moderately at risk, ranking it 51st out of 279 cities globally. That said, “moderate risk” does not mean “no risk” and we should not become complacent.