Advertisement

One Belt, One Road – A Connected Future

[Sponsored article] In a series of stories, we discuss with leading thinkers what “One Belt One Road” means to the business world and Hong Kong as well as the role our School can play.

Paid Post:HKUST Business School
Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
One Belt, One Road – A Connected Future

[Sponsored article] In a series of stories, we discuss with leading thinkers what “One Belt One Road” means to the business world and Hong Kong as well as the role our School can play. Two prominent leaders Dr Vincent H.S. Lo and Dr Hans Michael Jebsen, together with faculty of HKUST and our partner school, share their insights

Advertisement

Launched in 2013 by President Xi Jinping, the One Belt, One Road (OBOR) initiative aims to transform the level of connectivity, cooperation and trade between a band of nations stretching from China, across Asia, and into Eastern Europe and Africa.

Embracing more than 60 countries, with a combined population well in excess of four billion people, the scale and ambition of this project is breathtaking.

The states involved are strung along the land-based ‘Silk Road Economic Belt’ and the ‘Maritime Silk Road’, routes that formed the basis of the ancient Silk Road. But instead of silks and spices, today’s deals are being struck over high-tech railways, energy pipelines, ports and highways, with estimates for the possible eventual levels of investment soaring into the trillions of US dollars.

When he announced his initiative, it’s unlikely that President Xi foresaw events such as the election of President Trump in the US and the Brexit vote in the UK. However, there’s no doubt that the chilling effect these, and similar populist votes across Europe, threaten to have on world trade, mean a shift in China’s focus away from the West. This could come to seem very timely.

Advertisement

There are naysayers, of course. They wonder how many of the OBOR countries have the political stability, a large enough pool of skilled workers or sufficient basic infrastructure, to ensure investment isn’t a reckless gamble. Or they question whether the initiative isn’t really simply a Chinese bid for regional hegemony. 

Advertisement