Advertisement
Gartner MQ for Primary Storage
Business

Heads Up CIOs: What Lies Behind the 2024 Gartner Magic Quadrant Report for Primary Storage

Paid Post:Xugu DB
Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Heads Up CIOs: What Lies Behind the 2024 Gartner Magic Quadrant Report for Primary Storage
Advertising partner

[The content of this article has been produced by our advertising partner.]

As the data storage industry evolves, Gartner’s changes to the 2024 Magic Quadrant for Primary Storage Platforms (PSP) are causing concern among vendors and customers. The reorientation toward hyperscaler integration  and  geopolitical raises critical questions about competition, innovation, and customer choice.

Yet, the latest Magic Quadrant for Primary Storage Platforms reveals a troubling shift—a pronounced emphasis on integration with North American cloud platforms. Industry leaders like Huawei, Hitachi, and Infinidat, known for their innovation and global reach, have been demoted from Leaders to Challengers. This change isn’t due to diminished capabilities but reflects Gartner's revised criteria, which disproportionately prioritize "platform-native service capabilities" tied to North American infrastructure.
Image from gartner.com
Image from gartner.com
Traditionally, the Leaders quadrant included companies with broad market share, global presence, and consistent financial performance, while Challengers have strong execution but less market influence. Gartner’s revised criteria favour hyperscalers, pushing traditional vendors into the Challengers quadrant despite offering best-in-class storage solutions. This shift could have significant implications for vendors and enterprise customers and unfairly distort the market.
Advertisement

Inclusion and Evaluation Criteria Revisions Favour Hyperscalers

The revisions by Gartner heavily emphasise platform-native services, storage-as-a-service, and hybrid cloud architectures, where hyperscalers excel. A similar story unfolds with a focus on software-defined storage. Moreover, Gartner’s revised criteria demand a global presence across major geographies, further cementing the advantage for hyperscalers. 

Advertisement

While many traditional vendors maintain strong customer bases in specific regions, they often lack the extensive global infrastructure of hyperscalers, which operate on a global scale by design. This challenges vendors outside the United States, where the hyperscalers dominate. Traditional vendors offering high-quality solutions with a strong vision for the future will be disadvantaged due to their limited global reach, an issue sometimes driven by geopolitical constraints rather than a lack of capability. For example, regional players in Europe and Asia-Pacific could be excluded from the Leaders quadrant by not having a substantial presence in North America. This is particularly contentious as Gartner arguably presents a less comprehensive view of the Primary Storage Market.

Revisions Limits Choice and Innovation

The criteria shift to favour a hyperscaler-dominant model could have far-reaching implications, fundamentally reshaping the competitive landscape of the primary storage market. One of the most concerning outcomes could be an erosion of competition and stifling of innovation. Traditional vendors, who have pioneered breakthroughs in areas like flash storage, data deduplication, and enterprise-grade data management, could be sidelined, resulting in a loss of innovation. 

Advertisement

Without competition, hyperscalers will be less incentivised to innovate, leading to a homogenised market where new and disruptive technologies struggle to emerge. Equally, if the Leaders quadrant only includes US-based vendors, it weakens enterprise IT's diversity, richness, and innovation, potentially negatively impacting its long-term prosperity and competitiveness.

Another significant risk is the increasing likelihood of vendor lock-in. As hyperscalers consolidate their power, businesses may increasingly rely on these cloud providers. Switching providers or integrating with alternative solutions could become costly or operationally complex, limiting customer flexibility and cost predictability. Over time, businesses may face fewer choices, higher long-term costs, and reduced negotiating power, leaving them vulnerable to market dominance by a few large players.

The Future of Primary Storage Requires Balance

Advertisement

The proposed changes to Gartner’s Magic Quadrant for Primary Storage will undoubtedly reshape the competitive landscape. While hyperscalers, almost by default, are positioned to thrive under the new criteria, traditional vendors will respond to the challenge. Critically, the future of the primary storage market depends on maintaining a balanced ecosystem. Gartner’s evaluation criteria must continue to reflect the diverse needs of the storage ecosystem, including recognising the scale and reach of hyperscalers while also valuing the specialised expertise and customer-driven focus of traditional vendors. Yet, its revisions seem at odds with this. 

This isn’t just a concern for storage vendors but also enterprise customers. Industry stakeholders, including vendors, customers, and policymakers, must advocate for a market that promotes open standards, fair competition, and customer choice. Only by maintaining a diverse market can we ensure that innovation continues to thrive and businesses retain access to the tailored solutions they need to succeed in an increasingly digital and interconnected world.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x