Advertisement
Opinion
US and China must team up to keep maritime trade routes free and safe
The Strait of Hormuz crisis shows neither state benefits when key waterways can become instruments of political pressure or economic coercion
3-MIN READ3-MIN
10
Listen
Dr Bao Yinan is an associate research fellow at Huayang Centre for Maritime Cooperation and Ocean Governance.
With the end of the 60-day US-Iran memorandum of understanding, tensions in the Strait of Hormuz have flared again. The crisis in the strait highlights how the security and stability of key international waterways are becoming an increasingly urgent global concern.
Over the past decade, major maritime routes have been affected by regional armed conflicts, geopolitical tensions and growing security risks. These disruptions have exposed a vulnerability in the global trading system: a key international waterway need not be formally “blocked” for shipping to become constrained.
A strategic international strait may remain legally “open” while ships face military threats, attacks, higher insurance premiums, sanctions-related risks, forced re-routing or arbitrary conditions for passage. In such circumstances, the question is no longer simply whether the waterway is “open” or “closed”, but whether ships can pass through it safely, predictably and at a reasonable cost. This distinction matters significantly to both China and the United States.
Global trade and energy transport depend on a limited number of key waterways, particularly the English Channel, Strait of Malacca, Strait of Hormuz, Panama Canal and Suez Canal. Disruption in any of these chokepoints can quickly spread through global markets by raising freight and insurance costs, delaying supply chains and driving up energy prices.
Select Voice
Select Speed
1x
AI-generated voice