Advertisement
Opinion
America is arguing over the wrong AI obstacle
Sluggish adoption can’t be blamed on overregulation, and restricting access to US frontier models is no defence against open-source Chinese rivals
3-MIN READ3-MIN
Listen
Last month, two Chinese companies released artificial intelligence models most people outside the industry know little about: Kimi K3 by Moonshot AI and Qwen3.8-Max by Alibaba Group Holding (which owns the South China Morning Post). The markets reacted even before publicly auditable evidence about the performance claims – detailed benchmark table, model card and licence – was made fully available.
In the weeks that followed, global chip stocks shed about US$3 trillion in market value.
That reaction, rather than the models, is the story. Obviously, nobody was repricing Chinese engineering – the benchmarks were not yet verified. What was being repriced was scarcity: the long-held assumption that the most capable systems would remain expensive, American and controllable. Portfolios had been built on that assumption. It is worth less than it was.
Washington’s instinct is to tighten: restrict access, extend export controls, build the wall higher. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has long been arguing the reverse, that America’s real danger is not runaway machines but a failure to diffuse its technology broadly and maintain an American AI technology stack globally. He is right, though it is worth remembering he sells the shovels.
Select Voice
Select Speed
1x
AI-generated voice