Advertisement
Opinion
Pax Sinica vs Pax Silica: how China-US mineral war is taking shape
The US approach of deploying capital and diplomatic leverage must make up for China’s years-long head start in building its reserves
3-MIN READ3-MIN
Listen
Chenjie Song is a PhD researcher at Johns Hopkins University and a policy consultant focusing on Gulf political economy and China-Gulf relations.
If 2026 were a chess match, critical minerals would be the opening gambit, and both China and the United States are going all out. On January 28, China’s Zijin Mining announced a US$4 billion takeover of Allied Gold’s three African mines. On February 3, Swiss mining giant Glencore entered talks to sell a 40 per cent stake in its Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) copper and cobalt operations to the US-backed Orion Critical Mineral Consortium.
Between the two announcements, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio hosted 54 countries in Washington on February 4 for the inaugural Critical Minerals Ministerial, unveiling US$30 billion in financing and launching the Forum on Resource Geostrategic Engagement (Forge), a new preferential trade bloc. The moves complement Washington’s Pax Silica initiative, the State Department’s flagship effort to secure AI-era supply chains among nine allied partners.
US efforts to outbid China for Africa’s minerals are a taste of what is to come this year. A pause last October in the US-China trade war saw tariffs on Beijing drop to 47 per cent, but this is a temporary truce during which both superpowers have been anything but idle. China’s one-year suspension of rare earth export controls has provided breathing room for both sides, with corporations and governments using this window to aggressively expand mineral access.
Select Voice
Select Speed
1x
AI-generated voice