Advertisement
Nato
OpinionWorld Opinion
Opinion
Thomas O. Falk

Nato must answer Russian air provocations with action, not ambiguity

For all the defence budget increases, European political will is uneven. However, issuing threats that are not enforced is dangerous

3-MIN READ3-MIN
3
Listen
An Airbus Tiger multi-role attack helicopter flies away during a multinational military exercise near Suurekivi, Estonia, on September 30, days after three Russian fighter jets entered Estonian airspace. Photo: AP
Thomas O. Falk is a journalist.

There is a taxonomy of weakness. At the bottom lies bad policy and worse rhetoric. Above that sits a particular kind of failure that is quietly corrosive: the proclamation of a “red line” that is never enforced. That is what we are now witnessing in Europe.

The facts are plain. In one recent Russian assault, Poland shot down 19 objects that penetrated its airspace in one night. Days later, three Russian MiG-31s loitered in Estonian airspace. Drones have flown over Danish military bases, incursion alarms have shut down airports in Denmark and recent drone activity forced Munich Airport to suspend operations temporarily.

Asked about the drones at the Valdai Discussion Club in Sochi, Putin mockingly said, “OK, I won’t do it any more.” But these are all calibrated tests of will. A fighter that lingers where it has no right to be must be shot down – after warnings.

Russia’s incremental pattern is not novel: Georgia in 2008, Crimea in 2014, Donbas in 2022. Aggression does not so much explode as seep, and President Vladimir Putin doesn’t advance because he is endowed with irresistible strength. He advances because he calculates Western weakness.

Select Voice
Select Speed
1x
AI-generated voice