Opinion | Hong Kong doesn’t need lawmakers who have to be reminded to do their job
Amid a budget crisis and questions over government costs, the fact rules are needed to get legislators to turn up and vote is astonishing

Every now and then, Hong Kong’s Legislative Council reminds us of grade school. Just like in a school year, lawmakers have historically enjoyed a summer recess – of two to three months at the end of July – before beginning the next legislative year in October.
To ensure that school could still be out for the summer, lawmakers voted in 2023 to abolish a rule of procedure requiring that two consecutive meetings are not held more than six weeks apart in the same legislative year. Summer was saved – by lawmakers undoing the rules.
In 2022, former lawmaker Wong Kwok-hing urged the chief executive to cancel the recess altogether. In 2023, commentator Chris Wat Wing-yin called the arrangement ridiculous and wondered why not a single member of the expanded 90-person Legco had proposed its cancellation.
Every time the subject is brought up, lawmakers react with indignance. It’s not a break from work but an adjournment of meetings, they say; they don’t stop working because there are other meetings and events to attend and people to meet; and, some of these people they need to meet require overseas travel as lawmakers work to tell good stories of Hong Kong, they also say.