bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

sponsorType

authorLocations

authors

paywallTypes

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

factSheets

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

copyrighted

customTimezone

liveContents

Dennis Lee

So many acronyms, so little time.
In design and construction, more standards and programmes have surfaced in the evolving call for green and sustainable design. With some catchy acronyms, it can feel like the name was reverse-engineered to fit.
Popular acronyms include LEED, which stands for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, and BREEAM, for Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method. In Hong Kong, we have abbreviations such as BEAM Plus (Building Environmental Assessment Method Plus).
And then, there is ESG – short for environmental, social and corporate governance. In recent years, more architects have found themselves attending to the ESG agenda, which concerns a company’s business model, strategies and initiatives, and how it can provide services and products with a positive impact. ESG seems to be an upgrade of what used to be known as CSR, or corporate social responsibility, with a wider reach.
Most architects, already familiar with green design systems, sustainable materials and products, and the means to reduce the carbon footprint, emissions and wastage in building construction and operation, can readily tackle the “E” of ESG.
The “S” refers to social impact, including on the surrounding neighbourhoods and society at large, and this is highly dependent on outcomes, which take time to realise. The “G” refers to the company’s principles in leadership, management, standards in diversity, inclusivity and the upholding of human rights as well as stakeholders’ interests.


Of course, ESG does not apply merely to the design and construction industry. It can apply to any commercial activity, addressing non-financial risks and opportunities in day-to-day operations: from a company’s internal structure, resource planning, investments and policymaking to its engagement with consultants, suppliers, users, consumers and neighbours.
According to the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants, 7.5 per cent of the Hong Kong-listed companies it surveyed last year have obtained ESG “assurance” reports – essentially using external auditors to evaluate their ESG performance. This is not mandatory, although all Hong Kong-listed companies have to publish annual sustainability reports on their ESG performance.
Outside areas such as the design world, where environmental accreditation programmes with quantifiable metrics allow points to be earned and for certification, the metrics for ESG seem largely ill-defined with no universally recognised systems that measure and evaluate in a data-driven manner.
From the Hong Kong Chartered Governance Institute to property management giant Jones Lang LaSalle to the Diginex online platform, different organisations have come up with their own ESG training courses, ratings and tools. Gensler, one of the world’s biggest architecture firms, is developing a broad ESG analysis tool for companies to evaluate the properties in their portfolio. How is a company to evaluate its ESG performance with any clarity when there are yet to be common standards?




In his Time magazine article, “Why ESG is so confusing”, discussing the ESG backlash in the United States, Justin Worland pointed out that “the acronym means different things to different people” and “has contributed to confusion among neutral observers, including many investors and business leaders”.
Despite these multifaceted challenges, however, corporations from Schneider Electric and Disney to Starbucks and Apple are paying their executives based on their ESG performance, leading to the new phenomenon of ESG-linked pay. So, it seems, instead of encouraging acts of goodness for the environment and society from the heart, ESG is becoming yet another performance indicator that we have to tick off for a bigger bonus, a better reputation.
The United Nations has warned of “greenwashing”, which it describes as “the deceptive tactics behind environmental claims”. This includes, for instance, a mining company carrying out environmentally damaging activities but claiming to be ESG-conscious because of its focus on worker safety and diversity in employment. One can see the hypocrisy – and how the public might be fooled.
‘Loopholes’ endanger Hong Kong’s status as green finance hub: Greenpeace
Instead of looking for labels to earn, we should identify where we have not done enough and find ways to improve the weak links, be accountable for our actions and the damage we have done to the environment or to others, be humble about our limits and capabilities, and seek ways to collaborate and share resources.
Harvard economist and 2016 Nobel Prize laureate in Economic Sciences Oliver Hart reportedly believes that investors can drive changes that improve the world. In a 2022 interview, he said it was not helpful for investors to avoid “dirty” companies altogether.
Instead, investors can “engage with these companies and hold them responsible”. He says, “Using your voting power, and passing shareholder resolutions or electing people to the board who are going to actually change the company – that, I think, is a much more powerful mechanism”. He also suggested that “diversified shareholders might be willing to sacrifice some profit for the greater good”.

What ESG demands from commerce is a cultural shift towards a stronger sense of responsibility, not just to company shareholders, but to third parties who stand to be affected by company actions. Responsibility means a shift from Wall Street character Gordon Gekko’s “greed is good” mentality and economist Milton Friedman’s 1970 doctrine “The Social Responsibility of Business Is To Increase Its Profits”.
If we have such a sense of responsibility in our core values, we do not need fancy acronyms, photo opportunities in front of “green” banners, or certificates and plaques. All we need is good old integrity, accountability and humility in conducting any business, private or public – surely we all know that we live in an interdependent world and our actions affect others.
Dennis Lee is a Hong Kong-born, America-licensed architect with years of design experience in the US and China


Temperatures in Hong Kong to drop to 12 degrees Celsius on Sunday

Hong Kong yoga and sustainable farming couple pass on their skills at all-day event

Accelerating electric dreams in Hong Kong depends on smooth transition

Food recycling surges at Hong Kong estates even without waste-charging scheme

Hong Kong environmental issues

Instead of labels like ESG, let’s prioritise good old integrity

What ESG demands from commerce is a cultural shift towards a stronger sense of responsibility, not just to company shareholders, but to third parties who stand to be affected by company actions. Image: Shutterstock

Michael Douglas as Gordon Gekko in the 1987 film Wall Street. Photo: Handout

Hong Kong’s One Earth Summit must set sustainability standards, not hide behind superficial talk on green deals

Plastic and other debris is seen washed ashore at a beach in Denpasar on Indonesia’s resort island of Bali earlier his month. Investments are needed to clean up plastic pollution and reduce greenhouse gases. Photo: AFP

A still taken from aerial footage shows the site of a landslide in Mindanao, the Philippines, last month after flooding exacerbated by deforestation following unseasonably heavy rains. Photo: AFP

An Indian resident checks his phone as he waits to use a public toilet on a street in Chennai. Where are the returns for investors in building toilets? Photo: AFP

A homeless man begs for change along an elevated pathway in Manila. Billions of people in lower-income nations, the global majority, have yet to have their basic needs met. Photo: EPA-EFE

For Hong Kong to reach net zero, rethink our air-conditioned glass boxes

The afternoon sun shines on commercial buildings in Admiralty on October 26, 2023. The incessant use of air conditioning, alongside a myriad of other energy uses, means that Hong Kong’s buildings account for 90 per cent of electricity used in the city. Photo: Yik Yeung-man

Hong Kong Island is reflected in taped-up glass panels in Tsim Sha Tsui during a typhoon signal No 8 on September 1, 2023. Photo: Yik Yeung-man

Hong Kong plastic ban: let’s aim for reusables, not green disposables

People with takeaway food in Hong Kong’s Yau Ma Tei district on January 29. Starting from April 22, restaurants cannot offer customers any polystyrene products for takeaway services. Photo: Jelly Tse

Carbon tracker tools show how Hong Kong can aid global climate fight

People at the Tsim Sha Tsui promenade feel the effects of Typhoon Saola on September 1, 2023. As extreme weather becomes more frequent around the world, pressure on businesses to reduce carbon emissions has grown. Photo: Yik Yeung-man

A man walks past the HSBC headquarters in Hong Kong. Listed companies and banks in many economies, including Hong Kong, are now required or will soon be required to disclose their environmental performance. Photo: AFP

Opinion

Hong Kong Opinion

Business

News

Hong Kong

World

It can be hard to evaluate a company’s environmental, social and corporate governance performance amid the profusion of standards. But there is always integrity, accountability and humility to fall back on


It can be hard to evaluate a company’s environmental, social and corporate governance amid the profusion of standards. But there is always integrity, accountability and humility to fall back on.


ESG investing

Business of climate change

Climate change

Sustainability

Hong Kong property

Banking & finance

Property investment

Environment

Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)


Opinion | Instead of labels like ESG, let’s prioritise good old integrity

It can be hard to evaluate a company’s environmental, social and corporate governance performance amid the profusion of standards. But there is always integrity, accountability and humility to fall back on