Advertisement
US-China trade war
Opinion
Editorial
SCMP Editorial

‘Transshipment scam’ is not a global conspiracy but a warning to the US

The White House’s accusation that over 40 nations are involved in a shadow network that harms the US betrays a misunderstanding of how trade works

3-MIN READ3-MIN
6
Listen
Containers at the Port of Long Beach in the US on May 20. Photo: Los Angeles Times/TNS
Editorials represent the views of the South China Morning Post on the issues of the day.
The White House has raised the alarm over what it terms a “shadow” network of over 40 nations allegedly facilitating a massive transshipment scam, claiming that these countries are mislabelling the origin of Chinese exports to deceive American customs officials. While Washington frames this as an international conspiracy to rob the American economy of tens of billions of dollars, it is, in reality, a glaring admission of the ineffectiveness of its own trade policies.

Titled “The Great Transshipment Scam”, the front cover of the 25-page document features a Trojan Horse digitally composed of cargo containers. If the contents of those containers are from China, does this mean that America is Troy?

The document suggests that this “illegal” trade activity amounts to annual values ranging from US$40 billion to a staggering US$303 billion. Such a massive disparity in estimates renders the figures largely meaningless, serving more as political theatre than rigorous economic analysis. Behind these inflated numbers lies the argument that this trade activity has cost the United States hundreds of thousands of jobs and substantial gross domestic product growth.

However, this narrative collapses under scrutiny. The manufacturing jobs in question were moved offshore by American companies decades ago – not merely to China, but to nations including India, Bangladesh and Vietnam. To blame these countries, and specifically China, for the consequences of American domestic corporate strategy is disingenuous. Washington cannot hold other nations responsible for the hollowing out of its own manufacturing base, a trend that American corporations themselves accelerated in their pursuit of cheaper labour.

The timing of the publication is also relevant, coming a month before Chinese President Xi Jinping is scheduled to visit Washington for a summit with US President Donald Trump. Americans would be better off negotiating in good faith rather than playing such recurrent tricks ahead of major leadership summits.

Underlying this entire protectionist crusade is a fundamental flaw: the belief that trade barriers could force “reshoring” and create “safe” supply chains independent of China. This perspective ignores the reality of global market interdependence. Suppliers, wholesalers and distributors worldwide are simply responding to economic incentives, finding ways to bypass trade barriers that impede global commerce. Furthermore, at a time when inflation is already eroding the purchasing power of the American consumer, the attempt to force expensive, alternative supply chains is a recipe for further economic strain.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x