bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

sponsorType

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

quizIds

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

paywallTypes

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Naomi Ng

Chinese scientist Dr He Jiankui shocked the world when he claimed he had created the first genetically modified babies on Monday.
The controversial experiment involved altering the DNA of twin girls, Lulu and Nana, to disable a specific gene that allows HIV to infect human cells.
It drew worldwide condemnation, with experts pointing out such research was unethical because children born using it could die from unknown side effects and the technology could be abused.
At the Second International Summit on Human Genome Editing in Hong Kong on Wednesday, He attempted to address unanswered questions.


How many people were involved in this experiment and how did he get consent?
A total of eight couples – with HIV negative mothers and HIV positive fathers – signed up voluntarily for the experiment, after being recruited by an HIV/Aids volunteer group. One couple later dropped out.
The clinical trial has since been put on hold after the controversy broke, but He also revealed there was another potential pregnancy of a gene-edited embryo.
In this specific case, Lulu and Nana’s parents were volunteers with a good educational background, according to He.
The couple had gone through two rounds of informed consent with He and a team member from his lab. The consent was reviewed by four people.
The couple was given time to discuss their decision privately afterwards.
Why did he do it?
In response to comments on whether the research was targeting an unmet medical need, He said: “I believe this is not just for this case, but millions of [HIV-exposed, uninfected] HEU children.
“They need this protection since a HIV vaccine is not available. I have personally experienced an Aids village where 30 per cent of the residents were infected. They have to give their children to relatives to raise just to prevent potential transmission.”

How was the experiment conducted?
He began the project three years ago. The team first studied the CCR5 gene in mice, then monkeys before looking to see if it could be conducted on human embryos.
For Lulu and Nana’s case, the CCR5 gene was shortened in one case, while it was cut out in the other case.
Was it ethical and did it go through a peer review?
He said he had consulted “top ethicists” in the United States, including from Stanford University and Harvard University. He said his thinking was based on ethics statements from the US and UK that signalled the “majority of the public [supported] human genome editing for treatment including HIV prevention”.
Scientist reveals another woman ‘pregnant with gene-edited baby’
The academic said his study had been sent to a journal and was under peer review.


How will this affect what will happen in the future?
He said that in the future, he would propose his accumulated data should be made available to experts. But it would be “up to society to decide what to do next”.
The couple themselves would be kept under careful monitoring. He did not answer directly whether Lulu and Nana’s identity would be revealed, but only said that it was against Chinese law to disclose the identity of HIV positive people in public.
Are there any conflicts of interest?
He paid for all medical expenses for the patients out of his own pocket when he began his research at the Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen. Some of the sequencing costs were covered by the university’s start-up funding. The families do not receive any money for this experiment.
China’s National Health Commission, the hospital where the trial was said to have been conducted and He’s university have denied all knowledge or participation in the project.

What do other people think? 
David Baltimore, an American, Nobel Prize-winning biologist, who chairs the conference, said: “I personally don’t think it was medically necessary … the choice of disease we heard discussions about earlier today are much more pressing than providing to one person some protection against HIV infection.
Professor Robin Lovell-Badge, who moderated the discussion of He’s session in the summit, said He was probably misguided.
“He obviously thought he was doing a good thing,” said Lovell-Badge, a scientist from the Francis Crick Institute in London. “But I personally feel that he was misguided. He was taking wrong advice.”
Would he do the same with his own children?
“If it was my baby, with the same situation, yes I would try first,” He said.


China’s innovative solution to tackling toxic and damaging oil spills: ‘urgent priority’

Chinese scientist Li Haibo dies aged 41 amid concern over ‘insane’ workload among academics

After decades in the US, star Chinese mathematician couple returns home

Pig kidney removed from US woman after record-setting 4 months

Science

What do we know about Chinese scientist He Jiankui’s claim to have created the first genetically modified babies who are immune to HIV?

epa07194201 Mainland Chinese scientist He Jiankui presents a slide showing his work at the Second International Summit on Human Genome Editing, at the University of Hong Kong in Hong Kong, China, 28 November 2018. He Jiankui claims to have created the world's first genetically-edited twin babies, named Lulu and Nana, and has defended his work amid a storm of criticism from the world's scientific community. Critics have called the scientist's work medically unnecessary and ethically questionable. EPA-EFE/ALEX HOFFORD EPA-EFE/ALEX HOFFORD

epa07194202 Mainland Chinese scientist He Jiankui presents a slide showing his work at the Second International Summit on Human Genome Editing, at the University of Hong Kong in Hong Kong, China, 28 November 2018. He Jiankui claims to have created the world's first genetically-edited twin babies, named Lulu and Nana, and has defended his work amid a storm of criticism from the world's scientific community. Critics have called the scientist's work medically unnecessary and ethically questionable. EPA-EFE/ALEX HOFFORD

Chinese scientist He Jiankui who claims to have made gene-edited babies attends the Second International Summit on Human Genome Editing at the University of Hong Kong. Photo: Sam Tsang

China’s gene editing Frankenstein He Jiankui, dubbed ‘mad genius’ by colleagues, had early dreams of becoming Chinese Einstein

Chinese scientist He Jiankui. Photo: HANDOUT

Controversial gene editing scientist He Jiankui (seated) in the lab at China’s Southern University of Science and Technology at Shenzhen. He is currently on sabbatical from his research position at the university. Photo: Handout

Scientists line up to take aim at research behind Chinese biologist He Jiankui’s gene-edited babies

Jennifer Doudna, a scientist at the University of California, Berkeley (seen on Tuesday) was among those who criticised He Jiankui, the scientist who claimed to have gene-edited the embryos of a pair of twins. Photo: AP

Chinese scientist He Jiankui at centre of gene-editing controversy ran second experiment on human embryos, new document reveals

Scientist He Jiankui poses with ‘The Human Genome’, a book he edited. Photo: Handout

Chinese scientists condemn ‘crazy’ and ‘unethical’ gene-editing experiment

More than a 120 scientists signed a letter saying it was wrong to conduct such experiments without knowing whether it was safe. Photo: AP

China to investigate whether ‘shocking’ gene-edited twin experiment by He Jiankui broke the law

Chinese scientist He Jiankui claims he helped make world's first genetically edited babies: twin girls whose DNA he said he altered. Photo: AP

In this Oct. 9, 2018 photo, Zhou Xiaoqin, left, loads Cas9 protein and PCSK9 sgRNA molecules into a fine glass pipette as Qin Jinzhou watches at a laboratory in Shenzhen in southern China's Guangdong province. Chinese scientist He Jiankui claims he helped make world's first genetically edited babies: twin girls whose DNA he said he altered. He revealed it Monday, Nov. 26, in Hong Kong to one of the organizers of an international conference on gene editing. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

In this Oct. 9, 2018 photo, Zhou Xiaoqin adjusts a monitor showing a video feed of Qin Jinzhou moving a fine glass pipette containing Cas9 protein and PCSK9 sgRNA to an embryo under a microscope at a laboratory in Shenzhen in southern China's Guangdong province. Chinese scientist He Jiankui claims he helped make world's first genetically edited babies: twin girls whose DNA he said he altered. He revealed it Monday, Nov. 26, in Hong Kong to one of the organizers of an international conference on gene editing. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

News

Hong Kong

Health & Environment

Controversial experiment involved altering DNA of twin girls to disable specific gene that allows HIV to infect human cells
It drew global condemnation, with experts saying such research was unethical as children could die from unknown side effects and technology could be abused


Controversial experiment involved altering DNA of twin girls to disable specific gene that allows HIV to infect human cells, drawing global condemnation over the risks to the children and the potential abuse of such technology.


What do we know about Chinese scientist He Jiankui’s claim to have created the first genetically modified babies who are immune to HIV?

Controversial experiment involved altering DNA of twin girls to disable specific gene that allows HIV to infect human cells It drew global condemnation, with experts saying such research was unethical as children could die from unknown side effects and technology could be abused

How many people were involved in this experiment and how did he get consent?

Controversial experiment involved altering DNA of twin girls to disable specific gene that allows HIV to infect human cells

It drew global condemnation, with experts saying such research was unethical as children could die from unknown side effects and technology could be abused