Advertisement
China’s 20th Party Congress
ChinaPolitics

Qing dynasty expert Gao Xiang named head of China’s leading policy think tank

  • Leading historian promoted as president of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, which helps to shape party ideology
  • Gao Xiang is regarded as an expert on the country’s two last imperial dynasties who ruled from the 16th to the 19th centuries

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
10
The Forbidden City, now the Palace Museum, was China’s imperial palace during the Ming and Qing dynasties. Photo: Shutterstock
Mimi Lau
Beijing has appointed historian Gao Xiang, a specialist on the Qing dynasty, to head the influential Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) think tank.
Advertisement
Gao, 59, replaces Shi Taifeng, whose short seven-month tenure ended with his appointment after the 20th party congress to lead the United Front Work Department.
Gao Xiang’s career has largely focused on academia, but he has also served as Fujian province’s propaganda chief and as deputy director of what is now China’s Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission. Photo: Baidu
Gao Xiang’s career has largely focused on academia, but he has also served as Fujian province’s propaganda chief and as deputy director of what is now China’s Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission. Photo: Baidu

Gao served under Shi’s predecessor – the veteran economist Xie Fuzhan who headed CASS from 2018 – as vice-president, before his promotion last year as the think tank’s deputy party secretary.

While a number of regional think tanks have emerged in China, CASS stands out for its role in shaping the ideology behind the party’s policy formulation. Its academics also keep close ties with the top echelons of the Chinese government.

In June this year, an article written by a panel led by Gao and published in a Chinese Academy of History journal sparked an internet storm when it was interpreted by online commenters as a defence of the “closed door” policy of the Ming and Qing dynasties.
Advertisement

The article argued that – contrary to widespread opinion – China’s feudal rulers from the 16th to the 19th centuries did not pursue a policy of complete isolation, but one of “self-restriction” designed to protect the national interest and sovereignty and ward off Western invasion and colonisation.

Advertisement