appConfigEntityId

bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

isVideo

articlePageQuery

article

articleSchemaContent

content

hooksArticlePageAdvertisementConfigArticle

hooksArticlePageFloatingButtonConfigArticle

appConfig

filter

json

liveArticle

Finbarr Bermingham

A coalition of major EU member states is pushing Brussels towards a much tougher trade regime aimed at combating Chinese-style industrial overcapacity, including faster emergency tariffs, broader safeguards and new anti-circumvention powers.
A paper signed by Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, France and Lithuania days before a major China-focused debate in Brussels said the bloc must respond more aggressively to “systemic and structural industrial overcapacity” – phrases often taken as shorthand for Beijing.
The intervention comes as the European Commission prepares for a China policy orientation debate on Friday designed to chart a new course in light of growing complaints from governments and industries about the economic pressure caused by Chinese competition.
The paper – which has not been released publicly and which was first reported on by the Financial Times – calls for much more aggressive use of EU safeguard measures for sector-wide disruption, rather than product-by-product anti-dumping cases.
These allow for tariffs or quotas to be imposed where import surges are seen to be harming local industry. They have been used sparingly in the past, notably to counter surges in Chinese steel and ferroalloys, which are products used in the steel industry.

The paper – seen by the South China Morning Post – floats the adoption of a new “resilience tool”, to be “activated when European supply sources are concentrated beyond a specified threshold”.
This appears to be tacit endorsement of an instrument set to be presented by trade officials during Friday’s China debate, which will be presided over by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. This is likely to compel importers in crucial industries to ensure they have at least three suppliers in at least two countries, to stop the build-up of overdependence.
France’s position is well-known – President Emmanuel Macron on Friday called for a European “Section 301 tool”, in reference to a tariff mechanism used frequently against China by US President Donald Trump – but the inclusion of major member states Italy, the Netherlands and Spain suggests broader support for a revamp in China policy than previously thought.
While Spain has grown closer to China in recent years and is a popular destination for Chinese investment, officials have privately thought Madrid would back a more robust EU industrial policy.
The Netherlands, while traditionally a strong supporter of free trade, has been at the coalface of economic security issues with China and the United States thanks to the presence of companies like ASML and Nexperia.
The position of Germany – the bloc’s biggest economy which plays a dominant role in formulating China policy – has yet to be determined. Its Economy Minister Katherina Reiche will travel to Beijing this week for talks with Commerce Minister Wang Wentao, accompanied by companies deeply invested in China.


Brussels is hopeful, however, that the industrial impact of what is increasingly referred to as the “China Shock 2.0” could bring Berlin closer to the companies behind the new report.
The combination of US tariffs and China’s “unfair trade practices”, the paper said, “has had a direct impact on the European industry, which lost 1 million jobs between 2019 and 2025”. A separate report published last week by the Centre for European Reform estimated that more than 400,000 German jobs tied to exports to China may already have been lost to China.
The paper describes a reality where Brussels trade officials are overwhelmed by the volume of dumping and subsidy complaints, asking for those departments responsible to be beefed up.
Those anti-dumping and anti-subsidy probes – the lion’s share of which concern China – should be complemented with emergency safeguard measures, which can be implemented more quickly, the report said.
It proposed company-level countervailing duties, not just country or product-level ones. This could be potentially significant for Chinese firms operating globally through subsidiaries, which could find themselves in the EU’s crosshairs.
It wants tougher anti-circumvention measures, to prevent companies hit by EU tariffs from funnelling goods through third countries, and for an “economic security” mindset to guide the commission’s actions on trade.
“The growing imbalance in the level playing field for the union’s industrial base, and the risk of losing critical industrial capacities and strategic sectors cannot be ignored,” the paper read.
Friday’s meeting of the European Commission’s college of commissioners is expected to set the stage for a debate on China at the European Council, composed of the bloc’s 27 national leaders, in June.
After that, Chinese Commerce Minister Wang is expected in Brussels in late June. EU sources said recent meetings with Chinese officials had been characterised by a “menacing” tone, with Beijing vowing to retaliate strongly against a raft of policy measures being devised in the Belgian capital to deal with the challenge posed by China.


US-China decoupling could benefit other countries, China trade war game suggests

Why Sweden, once one of Beijing’s most outspoken critics in Europe, has changed its tune

Beijing lodges diplomatic protests over Taiwan official’s visit to Italy

China presses France to drop ‘protectionist’ anti-fast fashion law

China-EU relations

Major EU countries push for tougher China policy ahead of Brussels debate

France’s position is well-known, with President Emmanuel Macron on Friday calling for a European “Section 301 tool”. Photo: Reuters

The Netherlands – home to companies such as ASML – has been at the coalface of economic security issues with China and the US. Photo: ASML

Could Spain’s ‘compliment sandwich’ approach to China work for the EU?

Chinese President Xi Jinping (right) and Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez (left) arrive at the Diaoyutai Guest House in Beijing on April 11. Photo: Reuters

French President Emmanuel Macron is among a string of European leaders to have visited China since last year. Photo: AFP

China’s commerce chief Wang Wentao expected in Brussels on June 29 and 30: sources

Clashes between the European Union and China have grown louder in recent weeks, as the EU embarks on new policies designed to counter the shock to its industrial base. Photo: AFP

Commerce Minister Wang Wentao. Photo: dpa

EU picks tungsten, rare earths, gallium for first critical mineral stockpile

Labourers work at a tungsten mining factory at Zhongshan, China. Photo: Reuters

Workers use machinery to dig at a rare earth mine in Ganxian county in central China’s Jiangxi province. Photo: AP

Chinese investment in Europe surges to 7-year high despite rising trade tensions

Chinese battery giant Contemporary Amperex Technology Ltd is building a huge new facility in Debrecen, Hungary. Photo: Reuters

EU sounds out industry over new trade weapon against China’s overcapacity

A proposed new tool to tackle competition from China’s manufacturers is expected to be considered by EU commissioners on May 29. Photo: AFP

Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission. Photo: EPA

News

China

Diplomacy

Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, France and Lithuania call for more aggressive response to ‘systemic and structural industrial overcapacity’


Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, France and Lithuania call for more aggressive response to ‘systemic and structural industrial overcapacity’.


Major EU countries push for tougher China policy ahead of Brussels debate

.css-1c6uqr6{color:inherit;font-weight:inherit;font-size:inherit;font-family:inherit;line-height:inherit;overflow-wrap:break-word;}Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, France and Lithuania call for more aggressive response to ‘systemic and structural industrial overcapacity’

Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, France and Lithuania call for more aggressive response to ‘systemic and structural industrial overcapacity’