appConfigEntityId

bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

isVideo

articlePageQuery

article

articleSchemaContent

content

hooksArticlePageAdvertisementConfigArticle

hooksArticlePageFloatingButtonConfigArticle

appConfig

filter

json

liveArticle

Bochen Han

Laura Zhou

The US must prepare for a potential conflict with China by raising its defence spending to more than 3 per cent of GDP, a bipartisan group of lawmakers heard on Wednesday.
The recommendation came during an interactive exercise for members of the House select committee on China, based on a scenario predicted for 2026, and hosted by Washington-based think tank the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).
US officials have frequently cited 2027 as a critical point for when they expect Beijing to be capable of mounting a serious military threat to Taiwan, the self-ruled island that many regard as a potential flashpoint between the two powers.
“The Chinese defence industrial base is what I would call on a wartime footing,” Seth Jones, president of the CSIS defence and security department, told lawmakers at the US Capitol Building.
While noting that war with China was not necessarily imminent, Jones said Beijing was “building capabilities for ambitious purposes” and would be in a position by 2027 or so to fight the US.
Beijing views Taiwan as part of China to be reunited, by force if necessary. Like most countries, the US does not recognise the island as an independent state. However, Washington is committed by law to support Taiwan’s ability to defend itself.
In pushing for a defence spending increase on the present level of about 3 per cent of the US gross domestic product, Jones echoed the calls of defence hawks who say that Washington must adopt a “cold war” stance against China.
“We were anywhere between 15 and six during the Cold War, so as a percentage of GDP we’re low,” he said, adding that the United States was no longer in a “peacetime environment”.
Speaking after the event, Jones told the Post that he did not have a particular figure in mind. “I don’t know whether it’s 4 per cent or 5 per cent or 6 per cent … but 3 per cent is not going to cut it,” he said.


Among the attendees who appeared receptive to the proposal was Rob Wittman, a Republican from Virginia who has pushed President Joe Biden’s administration to increase the defence budget.
According to Wittman, there would be “no way” for the US to develop a defence industrial capacity to match China’s by 2027, assuming existing funding levels.
Noting that the simulation focused only on “exquisite” defence platforms – cutting-edge technologies likely to encounter high costs and delays – Wittman called for consideration to be given to developing faster and cheaper military platforms.
But Raja Krishnamoorthi, an Illinois Democrat and ranking member of the committee, said he preferred to focus on redeploying the resources the US already had, rather than increasing the defence budget.
“People already think there’s too much waste,” he said, noting that Washington’s current defence budget is about US$900 billion.
Krishnamoorthi asked if there was “low-hanging fruit” that Congress could tackle.
In response, Jones highlighted submarines, as well as air, subsurface, and surface autonomous platforms, in addition to stand-off weapons that are designed to allow operators to engage a target from a significant distance.
Jones also said the US could look to Japan and South Korea, two major allies in the Indo-Pacific region and the world’s biggest shipbuilders outside China, to help increase its battleship supply.


Japan hosts 15 major US military bases and is home to the highest number of American military personnel stationed overseas. Tokyo has also been rapidly upgrading military facilities on Yonaguni, which lies only 110km (68 miles) east of Taiwan.
The lawmakers heard about numerous challenges to America’s defence industrial base, including its reliance on China’s critical minerals – essential for building advanced military systems and weapons – as well as a shrinking shipbuilding capacity and an insufficient stockpile of critical munitions.
Matt Cancian, an associate professor at the US Naval War College who also took part in the briefing, said that defending Taiwan also presented unique strategic challenges compared to the situation in Ukraine.
According to Cancian, unlike the war in Ukraine – where military aid and equipment flow steadily through Europe – Taiwan would face a starkly different reality, in which the People’s Liberation Army could swiftly blockade any incoming supplies in the event of a war.
Cancian and Jones agreed, however, that undersea technologies remained an advantage for the US over the PLA, which has made slow progress in manufacturing high-end submarines despite decades of pushing to modernise its navy.
The assessments about China reached during Wednesday’s briefing echoed some of the recent findings from congressional advisory bodies.
A report released this week by the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission, an independent panel that advises lawmakers on China, found there was “no evidence” that China was preparing for an imminent war.
“But the various reforms China has made to its defence mobilisation system over time undeniably make it more confident and prepared for hostilities than it was five years ago,” it said.
Earlier this year, the US released its first National Industrial Defence Strategy, acknowledging that a declining industrial base, supply-chain constraints and the outflow of weapons to Ukraine have left it vulnerable as companies supplying the Pentagon face mounting frustration over its lumbering pace.
The defence industrial base, as used in Washington, typically refers to organisations, facilities, and resources that provide defence-related materials, products, and services to the US government – mainly, but not exclusively, the Department of Defence.


US space weapons move has ‘broken taboo’, could spark new arms race, Beijing forum told

Trump’s Greenland deal aims to boost leverage at Xi summit, midterms: analysts

Patriot dedicated to Hong Kong: business heavyweights remember Tung Chee-hwa

Why a Chinese farmer’s reunion with a US teacher moved me to tears

US-China relations

China war scenario calls for US boost in defence spending to more than 3% of GDP

Members of the US House select committee on China take part in an interactive simulation on the state of the US defence industrial base on Wednesday. Photo: Laura Zhou

As US rivalry intensifies, Chinese strategists call for new approach to nuclear deterrence

Illustration: Lau Ka-kuen

Elon Musk’s China ties ‘a profound threat’ to US national security: senator

Elon Musk’s electric vehicle company Tesla makes half of its cars in China, which also accounts for one-third of its sales. Photo: Aly Song

Tesla CEO Elon Musk and Chinese Premier Li Qiang meet in Beijing in April 2024. Photo: Xinhua

US report warns PLA electronic warfare could pose ‘significant challenge’ in Taiwan Strait

China’s air force operates J-16D electronic warfare fighter jets for radar jamming, according to a new US government report. Photo: AP

At G20, Xi Jinping and Anthony Albanese discuss improved China-Australia trade relations

Chinese leader Xi Jinping speaks with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese as they prepare for a group photo during the G20 summit in Rio de Janeiro on Monday. Photo: Reuters

With Rio’s Sugar Loaf mountain in the background, China’s Xi Jinping (centre) mingles with other leaders and diplomats at the G20 summit on Monday. Photo: AP

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz (left) and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese attend the G20 summit in Rio de Janeiro on Monday. Photo: Reuters

News

China

Diplomacy

Military

China’s projected military industrial base cannot be matched without increased spending, lawmakers hear


China’s projected military industrial base cannot be matched without increased spending, lawmakers hear.


China war scenario calls for US boost in defence spending to more than 3% of GDP

.css-1c6uqr6{color:inherit;font-weight:inherit;font-size:inherit;font-family:inherit;line-height:inherit;overflow-wrap:break-word;}China’s projected military industrial base cannot be matched without increased spending, lawmakers hear

China’s projected military industrial base cannot be matched without increased spending, lawmakers hear