appConfigEntityId

bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

isVideo

articlePageQuery

article

articleSchemaContent

content

hooksArticlePageAdvertisementConfigArticle

hooksArticlePageFloatingButtonConfigArticle

appConfig

filter

json

liveArticle

Jack Lau

Philippine coastguards have escorted boats to the South China Sea to resupply its military base on the disputed Second Thomas Shoal seven times in the past four months.
Each time, they have complained about China’s coastguards and maritime militia obstructing their journey to the disputed reef in the South China Sea or making dangerously close passes.

On Sunday, a steel-hulled Chinese coastguard ship used its water cannon against a much smaller Philippine supply boat and eventually collided with it in the most serious confrontation between the two sides in a year.
The Philippines said afterwards that the incident had damaged the boat’s engines, “disabling the vessel and seriously endangering the lives of its crew”.
It followed a similar collision in late October, again involving a Chinese coastguard ship and supply vessel.
Manila has chosen to publicise these confrontations ever since an incident in February, when Chinese coastguards shone a military-grade laser beam at Philippine boats near the Second Thomas Shoal and temporarily blinded a crew member. It calculates that publicity will help increase international support for its position.
“I believe that our effort in the transparency initiative has been very successful in rallying support from the international community to condemn the illegal actions of China and to make the Filipino people aware of what’s happening,” Commodore Jay Tarriela, a spokesman for the coastguard, said last month after another confrontation where Chinese forces used water cannons against Philippine ships.


After the confrontation on Sunday, the United States, a long-term ally of Manila, said the Chinese ships had acted dangerously and warned that an armed attack on the Philippine coastguard could trigger their mutual defence treaty.
Sweden, Britain, New Zealand and Germany called for international law and an arbitration ruling that invalidated Beijing’s sea claims to be respected. Meanwhile, Australia, Japan and the European Union echoed the US in describing China’s actions as “dangerous”.
But although Manila appears confident in the strategy, diplomatic observers are sceptical about its long-term chances of success and whether it can prevent future confrontations between Chinese ships and those from the other South Sea claimants.
They say that even if Beijing and Southeast Asian countries can agree a code of conduct for the disputed waters, no one can be sure it will change Chinese behaviour, especially when its crews are increasingly well-prepared and well-equipped for future confrontations.

The dispute began in 1999, when Manila deliberately grounded a second world war ship, the Sierra Madre, on the shoal after China began building on Mischief Reef, another disputed territory around 30km (19 miles) from the Second Thomas Shoal.
The ship, although it is rusting and needs regular resupply, now serves as a military base. Beijing has demanded its removal.
Manila’s current publicity drive has seen the government releasing video footage and photos that show Chinese ships following, surrounding and sailing close to its vessels – often leaving just a few metres between the ships.
The country’s national security council and other officials have also taken to social media to rebut China’s claims about the encounters, while Filipino and foreign journalists have been invited onto coastguard ships during resupply missions to troops stationed on the reef.
The series of confrontations have united Filipinos across the political divide in support of the government’s stance – a process that has gained momentum since August, when, for the first time this year, Chinese coastguards fired a water cannon at ships carrying supplies to troops stationed on the disputed reef and their coastguard escorts.
The strong response from Manila signals a change in policy since President Ferdinand Marcos Jnr took office in June last year.
South China Sea: China’s envoy to Philippines protests over weekend clashes
His predecessor, Rodrigo Duterte, had sought warmer ties with Beijing while trying to distance himself from the United States.
“This is part of shaping the narrative in the South China Sea and preventing Chinese state propaganda from changing the status quo in the international public opinion space,” said Rommel Jude Ong, a professor at the Ateneo School of Government in Manila.
The Philippines often cites a 2016 ruling by an international tribunal that invalidated Beijing’s extensive claims to the waters of the South China Sea, based on ancient maps and accounts of historical fishing activity, and marked out by the so-called “nine-dash line”.
The Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague said the historic rights to resources in the waters claimed by Beijing disappeared when it signed the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in 1982.
The tribunal also ruled that the Second Thomas Shoal, known in China as Renai Jiao and in the Philippines as Ayungin, is only exposed at low tide and submerged at high tide, which prevents the waters around it from being claimed as a territorial sea or exclusive economic zone.


Beijing has rejected the ruling and declined to take part in the proceedings, saying that the court did not have the power to decide on issues of sovereignty. The court said its decision did not touch on those issues.
Ong, who is also a retired rear-admiral of the Philippine Navy, said that beyond its public relations campaign, Manila also needed to work with countries such as Japan, Australia, Britain and France – as well as the US – on defence and security.
Japan and the US have been vocal in supporting Manila’s complaints of Chinese coastguards near the Second Thomas Shoal.
Ong also said it would be “the ideal and logical strategy” for the Philippines to band together with other Southeast Asian claimants in the South China Sea – Vietnam, Malaysia and Brunei – to “generate the gravitas to mitigate the asymmetry of power between Asean [the Association of Southeast Asian Nations] versus China”.
Philippines stands out in Asean over embrace of US’ Indo-Pacific strategy
“But this is not to be,” he said. “The dynamics with Asean, and the nature of the bilateral relationship of the other claimants, prevents such possibility.
“A divided Asean – and claimants – allows the CCP [Chinese Communist Party] to assert its position in the South China Sea with minimal challenge.”
The bloc prefers to adopt a collective approach to discussing the claims, but Beijing talks to Asean as a whole while also negotiating bilaterally with each of the claimant countries.
Talks between China and Asean on agreeing a code of conduct (COC) to prevent collisions and accidents at sea have been delayed for years, partly as a result of Covid-19.

The process has also been delayed due to disagreements between countries with stronger economic and political ties with Beijing and those with a more distant relationship over issues such as whether to include third parties, for example, the US, in the dispute or the legitimacy of the 2016 Hague ruling.
China and 20 other countries also signed the non-binding Code for Unplanned Encounters at Sea (Cues) in 2014 to prevent accidental clashes, but that code does not cover coastguards and militias.
“As neither an expanded Cues nor the COC have been finalised – and probably won’t be for the foreseeable future – they won’t have any impact on influencing China’s behaviour,” said Ian Storey, a senior fellow at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute in Singapore who focuses on maritime security.
“Whether the final agreements will do so depends on two things: first, how strong their provisions are; and second, whether China chooses to abide by them or not.”
Philippines ‘brainstorming’ against ‘more coercive actions’ from China at sea
Zhou Chenming, a researcher at the Yuan Wang military science and technology think tank in Beijing, said the best way to prevent inadvertent clashes was to maintain close communication. He said unlike in the past, the PLA Navy’s training programme covers how to make close encounters with other ships while avoiding collisions.
“After Chinese forces became more combat-oriented, [the PLA] has taken the initiative to deal with such crises,” Zhou said.
Ong also said the code of conduct and Cues would have no impact if China refused to abide by the rules.

He said the strategy of exposing Beijing’s actions near the Second Thomas Shoal should be paired with matching China in its sustained maritime presence and in protecting economic activities in the Philippine exclusive economic zone, which includes the Second Thomas Shoal.
He also said Asean should build up its Asean Coast Guard Forum as a “norm-setting institution” for Southeast Asia.
“In the future, it might be a significant player that can impose reputational costs on China and other countries that employ its maritime agencies as tools of coercion.”


Collision near Sabina Shoal sparks fresh escalation between China and the Philippines

Pride or practicality? Indonesia receives first aircraft carrier amid fears of upkeep cost

Filipino fishers count the cost of South China Sea dispute

Taipei donates coastguard vessel to Manila as South China Sea tensions mount

South China Sea

Will more assertive Philippine approach to South China Sea pay off in long run?

 Illustration: Lau Ka-kuen

A Chinese Coast Guard ship uses a water cannon against a Filipino resupply vessel heading towards the disputed Second Thomas Shoal, in the South China Sea on Sunday. Photo: Reuters

This frame grab from handout video footage taken by the Philippine Coast Guard shows a Chinese vessel allegedly ramming a supply boat on Sunday. Photo: AFP

In February a Chinese coastguard ship shone a “military grade laser” at a Philippine ship, allegedly causing temporary blindness among a crew member. Photo: AFP 

A Philippine coastguard watches on as Chinese ship follows his vessel near the Second Thomas Shoal last mont. Photo: AP 

South China Sea: Chinese coastguard blames Philippine boats for ‘collision’ near disputed Second Thomas Shoal

The Philippines says the China Coast Guard fired water cannons at  their vessels, while China has accused one of deliberate collision. Photo: Handout

South China Sea: Philippines ‘expects more coercive actions’ from China and is ‘brainstorming’ as stand-offs intensify

FILE PHOTO: A Philippine Coast Guard personnel looks through a binocular while conducting a resupply mission for Filipino troops stationed at a grounded warship in the South China Sea. Photo: Reuters

Philippine military chief, General Brawner, right, and vice-admiral Alberto Carlos, left share a meal with Filipino marines and navy personnel stationed aboard the long-marooned BRP Sierra Madre at the Second Thomas Shoal. Photo: PAO via AP

South China Sea: Chinese coastguard takes ‘control measures’ against Philippine boats near Scarborough Shoal

High-seas face-offs with China have intensified since Ferdinand Marcos Jnr became president of the Philippines last year. Photo: Weibo/单手搓核弹

News

China

Diplomacy

Manila is trying to give its maritime confrontations with China maximum publicity in the hope of gaining more international support
Some observers question whether this approach will prompt a change in Chinese behaviour


Manila is trying to give its maritime confrontations with China maximum publicity in the hope of gaining more international support.


China-Asean relations

China-Philippines relations