bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

paywallTypes

createdDate

publishedDate

sponsorType

urlAlias

moreOnThisArticles

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

articleSpeeches

socialHeadline

headline

images

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

sponsor

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Edward Howell

North Korea has conducted five rounds of missile tests in less than three weeks, in what Kim Jong-un has described as a “warning” to both the South and the US about joint military exercises.
But what signal does this send to Beijing?
First and foremost, this warning to the US and South Korea is nothing new. The North has, for decades, decried the South’s military exercises with the US as “war games” and “rehearsals for a nuclear war” on the peninsula.
But this latest warning comes at a time when the Democratic People’s Republic has been taking to both Seoul and Washington.
The North Korean foreign ministry deemed the exercises to be “a flagrant violation” of inter-Korean, and US-DPRK declarations that had been signed over the past few years.




Clearly, for Pyongyang, the “new relations” mentioned in the Singapore summit joint statement following Kim’s first meeting with Donald Trump, have not yet materialised.
In the eyes of the North, only when the “hostile policy” against it is stopped and these military exercises are scrapped, can any tangible discussions materialise.
Crucially, the foreign ministry’s dismissal of these exercises saw the DPRK assert how it may seek to counter the “defensive” US-ROK military exercises, saying it would “develop, test and deploy the powerful physical means essential for national defence”.
Kim Jong-un once scorned North Korean cosmetics. UN sanctions force him to change his mind
In true North Korean style, the international community was left to wonder what this could entail, but one need only look at the past to see what this “physical means” could comprise.
The short-range ballistic missile launches reinforce the sense that Pyongyang has not stopped developing its military and nuclear capabilities despite Kim’s “new strategic line”, which prioritises strengthening the domestic economy.

Yet, the North is also clearly frustrated: frustrated with the US for the stalled dialogue, but equally frustrated by China.
Beijing’s desire for peace and stability on the Korean peninsula may become increasingly frustrated as its influence over its “little brother” wanes, at least for now.
Donald Trump gets ‘positive’ letter from North Korea, says he agrees with Kim Jong-un’s unhappiness at US-Seoul drill
The DPRK has not lost its ability to use nuclear and missile launches for the purposes of brinkmanship.
Not only has North Korea become an expert at evading multilateral and unilateral sanctions it has also proved adept at playing off the great powers against each other – and the recent launches have put its relations with China at the forefront of the nuclear question.




Efforts by the South Korean President, Moon Jae-in, to engage the North, and persuade it to promise concessions on its nuclear programme have not borne much fruit.
China, however, has remained remarkably silent about the recent missile launches.
After the first launch on July 25, the Chinese foreign ministry called on the “relevant parties” to “treasure the hard-won chances for dialogue and alleviating tensions.”
Angry North Korea warns of more missile tests as Seoul begins joint drill with US
Such an ambiguous statement offers little in the way of concrete solutions towards any real progress on the North’s nuclear programme.
Sino-North Korean relations have fluctuated in recent years, with Beijing backing UN sanctions against the North, but balancing this with increased trade with its neighbour.
Trade between the two sides reached US$1.25 billion in the first of this year, a clear increase on the same period 2018.

Following North Korean short-range missile tests May, Trump dismissed them as “very standard”, and not a hindrance to the dialogue between the two sides.
For now, Xi Jinping may be thinking the same way about the recent missile launches: enough to warrant a stern warning from the big brother to the little brother, but not enough to disown him from the family completely.
Just as China was one of the winners of the Six-Party Talks – bringing the North together with its arch-enemy the US for talks that led to key agreements such as the Joint Statement of September 19, 2005 – so too will it strive to ensure that it also benefits from any future interactions with the DPRK.
Behind bars in North Korea: public executions and sexual violence are part of grim reality, UN says
Yet, China must realise the ever-pivotal role it plays here and that the “big brother-little brother” relationship may not always be sincere.
China wants to fulfil its own national interests and be perceived as a responsible state in the international system. It cannot – and will not – let North Korea disrupt its own endeavours.
Edward Howell is an ESRC scholar in international relations at the University of Oxford, specialising in East Asia and the Korean peninsula


The US is shifting THAAD from South Korea to the Mideast. What does that mean for China?

Air China to resume North Korea flights after 6 years amid warming ties

North Korea fires 10 ballistic missiles during US-South Korea military drills

Trump tells South Korea he is only leader who can break North Korean deadlock

North Korea

What do North Korea’s latest missile tests mean for China?

Kim Jong-un watches a missile test on July 26 this year. Photo: Reuters

(FILES) This early August 6, 2019 picture released from North Korea's official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) on August 7, 2019, shows the launch of an alleged new-type of tactical guided missiles  from an undisclosed western part location of the country. - North Korea fired two "unidentified projectiles" on August 10, 2019, into the sea, South Korea's Yonhap news agency reported, citing the country's Joint Chiefs of Staff, the latest in a series of such launches by Pyongyang. The South Korean military said the projectiles were fired from near the northeastern city of Hamhung into the East Sea, also known as the Sea of Japan. "The military is monitoring the situation in case of additional launches while maintaining a readiness posture," the Joint Chiefs of Staff said, according to Yonhap. (Photo by KCNA VIA KNS / various sources / AFP) / South Korea OUT / ---EDITORS NOTE--- RESTRICTED TO EDITORIAL USE - MANDATORY CREDIT "AFP PHOTO/KCNA VIA KNS" - NO MARKETING NO ADVERTISING CAMPAIGN

In this Thursday, June 20, 2019, photo released by China's Xinhua News Agency, spectators wave Chinese and North Korean flags as North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, left, and visiting Chinese President Xi Jinping attend a mass gymnastic performance at the May Day Stadium in Pyongyang, North Korea. North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, meeting in Pyongyang with Chinese President Xi Jinping, said Thursday that his country is waiting for a desired response in stalled nuclear talks with the United States. (Yan Yan/Xinhua via AP)

News

China

Diplomacy

Opinion


With Beijing’s influence over its ‘little brother’ waning it will want to keep its own interests in mind, writes Edward Howell
Pyongyang has said the test are a ‘warning’ to the US and South Korea and may be a sign of frustration



With Beijing’s influence over its ‘little brother’ waning it will want to keep its own interests in mind, writes Edward Howell


North Korea nuclear crisis

Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)


Column