bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

paywallTypes

corrections

sponsorType

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

factSheets

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Bochen Han

The US should welcome China’s best scientific minds into its universities to compete with the mainland’s success in AI, American lawmakers in Washington heard on Thursday, as Chinese start-up DeepSeek unnerved the global tech market this week.
“Let’s steal their best engineers,” said Melanie Hart of the Washington-based Atlantic Council at a hearing convened by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Referencing the Chinese talent behind DeepSeek’s AI models, Hart testified that “we’d be better off if the engineers behind that were working here in the US”.
To achieve that, she continued, students from the mainland would need to feel safe in America, adding: “We can beat Beijing at making Chinese scientists feel safe.”


Hart’s comments came as Washington debates how best to retain top talent while safeguarding US intellectual property rights and national security.
They also coincide with a growing trend of US-based Chinese scientists returning to the mainland, driven in part by concerns of racial profiling under American national security policies and expanding opportunities in China’s tech sector.
The debate took centre stage at Thursday’s hearing, as US senator Jim Risch, an Idaho Republican and the committee’s chair, saw a key “flaw” in the proposal to lure tech talent from the mainland.
“When a student comes over here, they got to go back,” Risch said.
“If they don’t go back, there’s a family there. And we all know what the Chinese government does to families,” he added, alluding to instances in which Beijing has pressured overseas Chinese nationals by targeting their relatives on the mainland.
Other witnesses on Thursday stressed that the US government needed to focus on challenging China’s growing tech capabilities by insulating American academia and the broader information space from Chinese influence, rather than recruiting talent from the mainland.
“The scale and scope of China’s predations in our research ecosystem are largely unknown,” said Jeffrey Stoff of the Virginia-based Centre for Research Security and Integrity.
The State Department should “play a much larger role” in closing regulatory gaps and bolstering compliance mechanisms to “ensure that real costs are imposed to the PRC when it violates commonly accepted norms and values of scientific research”, Stoff added.

Asked by Nebraska Republican Pete Ricketts what the US should do in response to the rise of Chinese platforms like DeepSeek and RedNote, Peter Mattis of the Jamestown Foundation, a think tank, recommended that Washington take the same approach it did with Chinese-owned short-video app TikTok.
TikTok, owned by China-based ByteDance, has been removed from US app stores as it faces a potential ban in the US on fears that Beijing may collect data from the app and manipulate its content. The popular app’s temporary halt in service earlier this month led American users to flock to RedNote, China’s version of Instagram.
“You have to adopt the same approach that was applied to TikTok: that it either is sort of removed from [Chinese] control or it is no longer available in the app stores,” said Mattis, contending that DeepSeek raises similar national security concerns.
Earlier this week, the emergence of Hangzhou-based DeepSeek sent share prices tumbling for semiconductor giant Nvidia and other major American tech companies.
Over the past few weeks, DeepSeek released two powerful new AI models built at a fraction of the cost and computing power used by American firms to create the technology underpinning generative AI services like ChatGPT.
Unease about DeepSeek came from other parts of the US Congress on Thursday.
In a letter to US National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, the leaders of the House Select Committee on China – Republican John Moolenaar of Michigan and Democrat Raja Krishnamoorthi of Illinois – pushed him to review the national security benefits of placing export controls on chips critical to DeepSeek’s AI infrastructure.
“Export controls and AI innovation are not mutually exclusive but two sides of the same coin,” said Krishnamoorthi. “If we want to outcompete the CCP in AI, we must protect our lead, safeguard Americans’ data and use common sense.”


DeepSeek, a TikTok ban and Trump’s inauguration: 7 US-China relations reads

China hits back at US tariffs with vow to take case to the WTO

Big swing: Chinese golf cart makers are moving to US to dodge tariff blitz

Trump says North Korea is a nuclear power. Why does it matter to China?

US-China relations

US should ‘steal’ China’s best AI talent to keep pace, Senate hears

The emergence of Chinese start-up DeepSeek has raised US concerns about the pace of its AI advances. Photo: Reuters

Leaders of the House Select Committee on China have urged Mike Waltz, the US national security adviser, to review the benefits of placing export controls on chips critical to DeepSeek’s AI infrastructure. Photo: AFP

Is DeepSeek’s AI ‘distillation’ theft? OpenAI seeks answers over China’s breakthrough

OpenAI says it has evidence that Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek distilled its closed-source models through authorised access. Photo: Reuters

OpenAI co-founder and CEO Sam Altman (right) stands next to (right to left) SoftBank Group chairman and CEO Masayoshi Son and Oracle executive chairman Larry Ellison as US President Donald Trump announced a new AI initiative called Stargate on January 21. Photo: AFP

Trump’s commerce secretary pick vows to keep China from using US tech to ‘compete with us’

Howard Lutnick, US President Donald Trump’s nominee to serve as commerce secretary, testifies before the Senate Committee of Commerce, Science and Transportation during his confirmation hearing in Washington on Wednesday. Photo: EPA-EFE

DeepSeek’s rattling of US tech stocks could change how America sanctions China: analysts

DeepSeek has created an open-source product comparable to its US competitors for what appeared to be a fraction of the cost. Photo: Reuters

Some analysts see DeepSeek’s impact as a reminder for the US to collaborate better with China. Photo: Shutterstock

US President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping are expected to extend their countries’ tech war. Photo: AFP

How tech start-up DeepSeek emerged as the unlikely game changer in US-China AI war

DeepSeek’s team of young scientists is made up almost exclusively of Chinese nationals from some of the top schools in the country. Photo: Shutterstock

DeepSeek founder and chief executive Liang Wenfeng speaks at a recent meeting in Beijing hosted by Chinese Premier Li Qiang. Photo: CCTV

What will it take for China to produce the next DeepSeek-style disrupter?

Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has topped the free download charts in app stores in both China and the US. Photo: AFP

News

China

Science & Technology

World

United States & Canada

Knowledge

Topics

US-China tech war & rivalry

US-China Relations

Politics

Technology

Tech

Policy

Tech Trends

Tech War

Talk of luring engineers follows mainland start-up DeepSeek’s emergence and ensuing shock waves felt by major American tech firms


Talk of luring engineers follows mainland start-up DeepSeek’s emergence and ensuing shock waves felt by major American tech firms.
