Australia panned ‘ridiculous’ Aukus delays. Now Britain is asking questions too
- Britain’s naval chief cautioned against becoming ‘hidebound by rules’ designed to enable the US to maintain its competitive defence edge
- His comments came after Australia’s ambassador to Washington had criticised ‘ridiculous’ US bureaucracy holding back faster progress on Aukus
Admiral Ben Key said US regulations should not be used to maintain a competitive edge at a time when Western powers find themselves in “as contested an environment as we have been in for many decades, in terms … of the global order.”
“We have to be very careful as to what it is that you want your rules environment to achieve,” he told Washington’s Centre for Strategic and International Studies think tank, referring to International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) governing US technology transfer, something the Aukus project requires.
In long periods of peace, the regulators predominate, and in war, ratcatchers predominate … we want ratcatchers
“If your rules environment is to prevent your adversaries from getting it and seeing what it is, that’s probably realistic,” Key said. “If your rules environment is to allow you a competitive edge in a different way, then I would question whether that’s really enabling what matters to us all, which is to try and ensure a security framework.”
Key cited as a cautionary tale a 1996 critique of bureaucratic obstacles to the effective exercise of British naval power that developed between the Battle of Trafalgar in 1805 and the Battle of Jutland in 1916.
“The analysis in The Rules of the Game is very clear: that one of the reasons that we were not as successful in the Battle of Jutland as many thought we should have been, is because we’d become hidebound by rules,” he said.
“What the author postulates is that in long periods of peace, the regulators predominate, and in war, ratcatchers predominate,” he said, referring to people unafraid to bend rules to achieve the desired outcome.
