How will the world react to North Korea's latest bombshell?
It may be time the world faced reality and offered N Korea economic and diplomatic recognition in return for curbing its nuclear ambitions
![Activists from an anti-North Korea civic group join a rally to condemn yesterday's nuclear blast. Photos: Xinhua, AFP](https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1020x680/public/2013/02/13/untitled-0.jpg?itok=_9ZRznU7)
It was a move that surprised nobody but shocked everybody, and experts are now awaiting evidence of the fallout.
Was North Korea's third test of a nuclear weapon proof that it has mastered a uranium-based detonation, a more sinister threat than the plutonium-based devices it tested previously?
![](/sites/default/files/styles/486w/public/2013/02/12/fe55342ec0a4fd995770481608d3cc81.jpg)
The North's Korea Central News Agency announced the detonation of a "miniaturised and lighter nuclear device with greater explosive force than previously", a reference to Pyongyang's aim to compress fissile materials to warhead size.
Condemnation followed from Seoul, but the timing may have been chosen to constrain an effective policy response: the Lee Myung-bak government leaves office on February 25, to be replaced by Park Geun-hye.
Although its exact timing was unknown, the test was widely expected as North Korea seems to be operating a roughly three-year cycle of missile and nuclear tests. Previous missile tests took place in 2006, 2009 and on December 12; previous nuclear tests happened in 2006 and 2009.
Moreover, following UN Security Council condemnation of its December satellite launch - widely believed to be cover for an intercontinental ballistic missile test - Pyongyang media had warned that it would conduct a "higher level" nuclear test.
![loading](https://assets-v2.i-scmp.com/production/_next/static/media/wheel-on-gray.af4a55f9.gif)