In praise of the low-tech

Writing a science and technology column, you tend to get caught up in the newest or Next Big Thing - Big Data, big discoveries, high-speed trains, high-speed trading. And living in Hong Kong in the Pearl River Delta region of mass production and massive infrastructure, you're immersed in the mentality that bigger is better and hi-tech is best.

But a recent trip to the Mekong Delta in southern Vietnam is a necessary reminder that local, low-tech and small-scale work just as well. In fact they often work better in developing countries, because they are appropriate to their context, making use of simple, affordable technology, local resources and homegrown skills to provide for the community's basic needs. This is quite alien to most of us in Hong Kong, where our food, shelter, energy and other needs are now met by huge, centralised systems, managed by corporations or government, using complex, capital-intensive technology requiring globally sourced components and legions of employees.

As the tourism pitch said, "A trip through the Mekong Delta is a journey back in time." And sure enough there's not much mechanisation to be seen in the picturesque rice paddies, coconut plantations and rural cottage industries (though mobile phones and base stations are ubiquitous). It's a journey to the strange old world of human-scale production and organisational simplicity. Here, the technology involves low-cost designs that are easy to use and repair, the raw materials are locally sourced, and the producer is also the consumer.

Visits to village factories in rural Ben Tre province called to mind that seminal work, Small is beautiful: a study of economics as if people mattered by E.F. Schumacher (1911-77), the British economist who advocated "appropriate technology" that is small-scale, decentralised, labour-intensive, energy-efficient, environmentally sound and locally controlled. He argued against costly transfers of complex technology to developing economies and dehumanising production systems that make people adjuncts to machinery. His thesis was much broader, of course, encompassing a whole philosophy of living, and has since evolved into what today is called sustainable development.