Reflections | How the ‘Asean Way’ differs from the failed alliances of China’s Warring States Period
Asean’s consensus-driven approach, based on non-aggression, generally fosters regional peace, unlike the factious alliances in China’s past

Last month, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) welcomed a new member: East Timor.
In 1984, Brunei joined after it achieved full independence. Between 1995 and 1999, the mainland Southeast Asian nations of Vietnam, Laos, Myanmar and Cambodia became full members, and “Asean-10” was, for the next quarter of a century, a catchy label for the organisation.
Initially formed to contain the spread of communism during the Cold War, Asean’s present mission is to build a cohesive, prosperous region, and deepen regional cooperation and integration. Geopolitically, this association is also meant to shield its member states from superpower rivalries and ambitions.
After 58 years, has the alliance met any of its objectives? To put it diplomatically, it is a work in progress.

