Trump’s ‘arrogant and appalling’ executive order targeting Smithsonian comes under fire

Washington’s Smithsonian is a sprawling chain of museums dedicated to both celebrating and scrutinising the American story. It is also the latest cultural institution targeted by President Donald Trump’s bid to quash diversity efforts. His recent executive order to excavate “divisive ideology” from the famed visitor attraction and research complex follows a wave of efforts to keep culture and history defined on his terms, including his takeover of the national capital’s prestigious performing arts venue, the Kennedy Centre. The order has got critics up in arms. “It’s a declaration of war,” said David Blight of Yale University, in the US state of Connecticut, who leads the Organisation of American Historians. “It is arrogant and appalling for them to claim they have the power and the right to say what history actually is and how it should be exhibited, written and taught,” he added. Trump’s latest order also says monuments to the historic Confederate rebellion, many of which were removed in recent years in the wake of anti-racism protests, might soon be restored. His order even mentioned America’s National Zoo – which is operated by the Smithsonian and recently welcomed two pandas from China – as potentially needing a cleanse from “improper, divisive or anti-American ideology”. Trump says a number of Smithsonian museums, including the distinguished National Museum of African American History and Culture, espouse “corrosive ideology” and are trying to rewrite American history in relation to issues of race and gender. Critical observers say the opposite is true. Margaret Huang – president of the non-profit Southern Poverty Law Centre, which tracks hate – called Trump’s order “the latest attempt to erase our history” and “a blatant attempt to mask racism and white supremacy as patriotism”. “Black history is US history. Women’s history is US history. This country’s history is ugly and beautiful,” Huang said. For critics like Huang and Blight, Trump’s push to tell a rose-tinted history of “American greatness” is a disservice to museum-goers in a complicated country built on values including freedom of speech – but whose history is rife with war, slavery and civil rights struggles. “What’s at stake is the way the United States officially portrays its own past, to itself and to the world,” Blight said. Trump is a 78-year-old Frank Sinatra fan with a penchant for Broadway – he has spoken particularly fondly of the 1980s-era musical Cats, the fantastical tale of a dancing tribe of felines. But his brand of culture war is much bigger than personal taste: in his second term, the president appears intent on rooting out what he deems too “woke”. The executive crusade is part of a broader effort to strip American society of efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion that institutions nationwide have vied to incorporate in recent years, purging culture of anti-racism and LGBTQ support. Critics say Trump’s extension of his grip to the Smithsonian represents an eyebrow-raising incursion into the programming independence of the more than 175-year-old institution. Founded in the mid-19th century, the Smithsonian “has transformed along with our culture and our society”, said Robert McCoy, a history professor at Washington State University. The complex – including the zoo, 21 museums, and 14 education and research centres – is around two-thirds federally funded, with the rest of its roughly US$1 billion budget stemming from sources including endowments, memberships and donations. Its Board of Regents includes the vice-president, J.D. Vance. But, similarly to the Kennedy Centre, until now it operated largely above political lines, especially when it came to programming. “It’s become more diverse,” McCoy said. “The stories it tells are more complicated. These are people who are attempting to help us broaden what it means to be an American – what it means to tell us stories about ourselves that are more accurate and include more people. “When you lose that, you begin to marginalise a lot of different groups.” McCoy fears the White House’s bid to clamp down on the Smithsonian’s work could prompt resignations. Blight echoed the concern. “If they stay in their jobs, they’re in effect working for an authoritarian takeover of what they do. That will not be acceptable.” Trump’s attempts at cultural dominance in federal institutions are part of a broader package of control, McCoy said, a pattern that echoes research on how authoritarian regimes seize power. “It’s not just political and economic institutions,” he said. “It’s also the institutions that provide people with a sense of meaning and belonging – that they’re American.”

Trump’s ‘arrogant and appalling’ executive order targeting Smithsonian comes under fire

‘It’s a declaration of war,’ one historian says of Trump’s attempt to excavate ‘divisive ideology’ from the historic museum institution