Opinion | Philippines stockpiling bilateral deals to counter Beijing in South China Sea won’t work
- Talks with Tokyo on a military base reciprocal access agreement are the latest Philippine effort to bolster the forces Manila can rely on to confront China
- However, agreements with Japan and the US would not apply if the Philippines takes aggressive action in the territory of another state
The logic is that the more such bilateral agreements the Philippines has, the more military forces the Philippines can rely on to confront China. However, neither a reciprocal access agreement with Japan nor the 1951 Mutual Defence Treaty (MDT) and Visiting Forces Agreement with the US provide the Philippines with legal tools to provoke China in the South China Sea.
First, since Second Thomas Shoal has never been the Philippines’ territory, the MDT cannot be applied under the territorial jurisdiction principle.
Pursuant to Article I of its 1935 constitution, the Philippines’ territory is defined by a series of international treaties, including the 1898 treaty between the US and Spain (the Treaty of Paris), the 1900 treaty between the US and Spain for the cession of outlying islands of the Philippines (the Treaty of Washington), and the 1930 convention between the UK and the US regarding the boundary between the state of North Borneo and the Philippine archipelago.