appConfigEntityId

bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

isVideo

articlePageQuery

article

articleSchemaContent

content

hooksArticlePageAdvertisementConfigArticle

hooksArticlePageFloatingButtonConfigArticle

appConfig

filter

json

liveArticle

Daryl Guppy

Australia has found a new best friend in Southeast Asia. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has embraced Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jnr, calling their countries “great friends” and agreeing to upgrade ties to a strategic partnership.
But the intensification of defence cooperation between Australia and the Philippines – both staunch US military allies – sounds a discordant note in Canberra’s relationship with the region, especially after Foreign Minister Penny Wong’s efforts at peaceful diplomacy and economic outreach.
At the Asean Indo-Pacific Forum in Jakarta, Wong accompanied Albanese as he unveiled “Invested: Australia’s Southeast Asia Economic Strategy to 2040”, a blueprint for economic engagement detailing how Australia intended to increase its business and soft power in the region.
In it, Australia commits to spending at least A$95.4 million over four years. This hardly compares to the US$2.8 billion price tag for a Virginia-class submarine, which Australia is committed to buying up to five of, under the Aukus deal. But the blueprint was a statement of ambition, and full marks go to Wong for commissioning and driving it.
However, this arc of peaceful diplomacy was quickly undermined after Albanese landed in Manila. There was no mistaking the intent and purpose of the visit. Under the proclamations of friendship was an agenda fully endorsed by security hawks in Canberra, many aligned with America’s Indo-Pacific vision.
This was just two weeks after Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles observed joint military drills in Zambales, Philippines. Standing on a beach, Marles confirmed that joint maritime patrols in the heavily contested South China Sea would begin soon – reportedly in a matter of months.

But it was Albanese who expanded the extent of cooperation with the Philippines, widely seen as a counter to China’s influence in the region. The coming joint naval patrols are viewed as resistance against China’s sweeping territorial claims. The leaders have also agreed to annual formal meetings between their defence ministers.
It was a disturbing example of the extent to which Australia was now prepared to do the bidding of the United States, or at least act in its interest and in its strategic direction.
So where does this leave Foreign Minister Wong and Moore, the special envoy for Southeast Asia?
It would seem that Marles has a greater influence on Albanese and this, coupled with his defence policy, is trumping attempts at diplomacy. The optics of the visits to the Philippines and its rapid elevation as Australia’s strategic partner has neatly undermined Wong’s genuine efforts to enhance consultation and cooperation in the region.
Australia’s partners in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, including Asean meetings host Indonesia, can only look on with dismay as Albanese and US President Joe Biden combine in a duet designed to increase militarisation in the region, even as they attempt to contain China with naval exercises that Beijing sees as provocative and belligerent. All of this runs counter to the urging of Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, who said at the recent Asean-China summit that Asean hoped to see the US and China show leadership in working cooperatively in the region.


If Wong’s diplomatic overtures were left dangling, it would further undermine Australia’s ability to build trust and play the honest broker in the region.
The strategic division between Marles and Wong go beyond any political infighting – it is no less than a battle for the strategic direction of Australia’s engagement with the region.
On one side is Australia’s commitment to Asean and its objectives of non-militarised solutions to the rise of China. In the other camp, hunkered behind an impressive array of weapons, is a militarised lens through which the exercise of foreign policy is viewed as an adjunct to military action.
Australia wants to court Southeast Asia, but its affections seem to be skin-deep
Albanese’s enthusiastic discovery of a strategic partner in the Philippines suggests that the military version of what foreign affairs is about, is firmly on the ascendant in Canberra. Wong is charming, intelligent and well-informed, but also increasingly an irrelevant player in Australia’s engagement with Asia.
Albanese’s flurry of visits to Asia was billed by Australian media as a six-day regional balancing act. Referring to the mixed diplomatic messages, an Australian official said: “Playing to just one side is the easy thing to do” but “you’ve got to do what you got to do”. Australia appears to be taking the easy way out by tipping the balance firmly towards military solutions.
Daryl Guppy is an international financial technical analysis expert and a former national board member of the Australia China Business Council. The views expressed here are his own


Morgan Stanley ‘fat finger’ leak of confidential deal pipeline sets off alarm bells

Australia slams ‘unacceptable’ OpenAI breach of government health portal

US turns to South Korea to ease ammunition bottlenecks amid global conflicts

US Air Force to shut down research centre focusing on Chinese military

Australia

In a dangerous tilt, Australia’s defence hawks are moving foreign policy away from diplomacy

Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles (left) and Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jnr watch joint military drills through binoculars on August 25 at a naval base in San Antonio, Zambales. Joint patrols are expected to raise tensions in the South China Sea, most of which China claims. Photo: AP

Albanese and Marcos Jnr pose for a photo after signing a memorandum of understanding for a strategic partnership at the Malacanang Presidential Palace in Manila on September 8. Photo: EPA-EFE

Australia only has itself to blame for trade woes with China after siding with the US

Silos are loaded with barley at a farm near Gunnedah, 443km (275 miles) northwest of Sydney, in New South Wales, Australia, on August 30. China agreed to lift tariffs on Australian barley last month, raising hopes among exporters that punitive measures enacted on other Australian goods might also be removed soon. Photo: Reuters

A worker walks near conveyor belts loaded with iron ore at the Fortescue Solomon iron ore mine in the Valley of the Kings, around 400km (248 miles) south of Port Hedland in the Pilbara region of Western Australia, on August 17. Photo: Reuters

As West exploits India-China cracks, Asia must rise above the divisive ideology

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Mahabalipuram, Tamil Nadu, on October 12, 2019. Sino-Indian differences are being purposely exacerbated by inducing India to join so-called Indo-Pacific initiatives created to counter Asia-Pacific cooperation. Photo: India’s Press Information Bureau / AFP

Opinion

Knowledge

Topics

China-Australia relations

News

Asia

Australasia

Australia’s deepening of defence ties with the Philippines, including joint patrols in the South China Sea, suggest an increasingly militarised foreign policy
This undermines Foreign Minister Penny Wong’s genuine attempts at peaceful diplomacy and economic outreach


Australia’s deepening of defence ties with the Philippines, including joint patrols in the South China Sea, suggest an increasingly militarised foreign policy.


The Philippines

Asean

Defence

South China Sea

Diplomacy

Aukus alliance

US-China relations: the Asian angle

Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)
