Advertisement
People walk near a large screen showing stock exchange data in Shanghai on March 15, a day after Asia-Pacific markets sank in the fallout from failed US banks. Photo: EPA-EFE

The recent and still-reverberating regional banking troubles in the United States require a frank assessment of the failures and faults by many actors. Central bankers and supervisors in other jurisdictions could learn lessons from America’s mistakes, in matters related to bank culture, regulation and supervision.

Advertisement

On bank culture, a topic on which the Group of Thirty has opined repeatedly, the lessons are clear. A firm’s culture, demonstrated by the board and leadership, determines risk appetite. The culture signals to mangers what to do and how to do it.

Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and Signature Bank adopted cultures that were closer to their borrowers’ than the conservative norms which they ought to have been following. SVB leaders had a venture capital arm and signalled its culture via its own investments trading. Signature served crypto clients and bank insiders reportedly invested heavily in crypto.

The companies became too close to their customers. They adopted risk-taking inappropriate to their social and economic roles. When the easy money stopped, these banks faced dangers similar to those of their overleveraged and concentrated customers.

Similar cultural mistakes may happen in China if local regional banks lend excessively to one sector (such as real estate or information technology) and ape their borrowers’ risk-taking behaviours. Chinese supervisors should be alert to such cultural and strategic errors.
Advertisement

In America, the banks’ boards appear to have failed to oversee the management and rising risks. SVB’s management was rated “deficient’ by regulators the year before its collapse. The SVB board was dominated by venture capitalists of a particular risk-taking Silicon Valley mindset.

loading
Advertisement