appConfigEntityId

bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

isVideo

articlePageQuery

article

articleSchemaContent

content

hooksArticlePageAdvertisementConfigArticle

hooksArticlePageFloatingButtonConfigArticle

appConfig

filter

json

liveArticle

Henry Litton

In a free and liberal society, it is not easy to define who is a “patriot”. For instance, many supporters of former US president Donald Trump, waving the national flag, would say that he was a patriot, striving to “make America great again”. Other citizens, however, claim he is a traitor to the US constitution.
In such a fractured society, it is difficult to find unanimity within the adult population on a subject as amorphous as “patriotism”.
Settled societies do not spring into life perfectly conceived, fully formed. Rather, they emerge from processes which are beset with stops and starts, suffused with failures and regenerations. Hong Kong is no exception.
Twenty five years ago, Hong Kong underwent a major political transformation: from a British Crown colony where the governor, appointed from London, ruled supreme, to a special administrative region of China with a high degree of autonomy, under the principle of Hong Kong people governing Hong Kong. Inevitably, such a transformation had enormous consequences for society as a whole.

One such consequence was the emergence of people who claimed to be leaders of a movement towards greater democracy. For a time, many people in Hong Kong believed in their credentials. Some of those leaders were members of the Legislative Council, holding high office in the eyes of the community.
Each of them, before taking their seat, had sworn to uphold the Basic Law. They could not have been ignorant of the provisions of Articles 45(2) and 68(2) of the Basic Law, which state that the development of representative government leading to universal suffrage should follow the principle of “gradual and orderly progress”.
If they were true to their oath, they would have seen their role as laying down the foundations of a sound and solid system of representative government. Instead, they embarked upon a course of destabilisation, inviting overseas participation in the process, allowing Hong Kong to be used as a proxy by Western entities to embarrass Beijing.
They had their photos taken with Western political leaders; they lobbied for sanctions to be imposed on Hong Kong and mainland officials; they attracted coverage in prestigious media overseas which praised them as “freedom fighters”. And when the insurgency erupted in the second half of 2019, they refused to condemn the violence.
Since reunification, the central government has been meticulous in implementing Article 68(2) of the Basic Law by gradually increasing the directly elected component of Legco, first by increasing it to 24 in 2000 and, further, to 30 in 2004. Then, in 2012, five seats were created for district councillors (who were themselves directly elected), thus making half the legislature directly elected.
But the pan-democrat members of Legco did not see this as an opportunity for good governance. Locked within their own narrow esoteric world, they saw Beijing as their enemy, and pulled out a bag of tricks to make Legco dysfunctional, bringing Hong Kong to the edge of disaster.


Without an effective legislature, Hong Kong became ungovernable. The principle laid down by the central government – Hong Kong people governing Hong Kong – had led to chaos.
Eventually, Beijing intervened to stabilise the situation, making radical amendments to the electoral process, to ensure that patriots governed Hong Kong.
This has been heavily criticised in the Western media and by Western political leaders, without first finding out why those steps have been taken. Locked within their own ideology, they refuse to acknowledge that Hong Kong now has an effective working legislature. Patriots are now in the driving seat.
Who, then, are they? They are men and women dedicated to upholding the constitution for Hong Kong, the Basic Law; honouring the principle of national integrity; intent on giving substance to the underlying concept of “one country, two systems”, affording due weight to the two elements. It is a matter of fundamental values.
They are fallible human beings. They will make mistakes along the way but, hopefully, will never lose sight of the setting of the compass which points true North.
Henry Litton is a retired Court of Final Appeal judge and author of “Is the Hong Kong Judiciary Sleepwalking to 2047?”


Hongkongers pay tribute to late leader Tung Chee-hwa at community halls

The story begins …

Hong Kong’s new chapter

Hong Kong politics

With patriots in the driving seat, upholding the Basic Law, Hong Kong is pointing in the right direction

Hong Kong’s incoming lawmakers pose for photographs following an oath-taking ceremony at the Legislative Council in Hong Kong, on January 3. Photo: Bloomberg

Incoming lawmaker Andrew Leung Kwan-yuen delivers his oath in front of Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor in the Legislative Council chamber on January 3. Photo: Felix Wong

Public trust surges in China, falls dramatically in world’s democracies

Public trust in democracies has hit new lows, according to a new survey, while autocratic states like China enjoy surging popularity. Photo: Xinhua

Hong Kong elections: ‘Patriots’ may have triumphed, but ‘lazy’ candidates shouldn’t take seats for granted, Beijing adviser says

Vote counts in Sunday’s Election Committee poll are announced early Monday morning. An adviser to Beijing on Hong Kong affairs has accused ‘lazy’ candidates of undermining a recent political overhaul. Photo: Sam Tsang

Questionable Ballot Paper Determination Zone at Central Counting Station of Election Committee Subsector Ordinary Elections at HKCEC in Wan Chai. 19SEP21 SCMP / Sam Tsang

What Hong Kong election results reveal about new legislature full of ‘patriots’: three new forces could emerge to pile pressure on traditional loyalists

Banners advertising a variety of Legco candidates blanket Wan Chai. Photo: Sam Tsang

Allan Zeman. Photo: Edmond So

Gary Zhang was successful in a geographical constituency. Photo: Handout

Yiu Pak-leung won in the tourism functional constituency. Photo: K. Y. Cheng

The Election Committee constituency has 40 lawmakers. Photo: Dickson Lee

Western-style democracy ‘would doom Hong Kong to chaos’, Chinese officials say

Government banners in Sham Shui Po to promote the electoral reform. Photo: K.Y. Cheng

Beijing is half-right about Hong Kong’s democratic failure

Ballots are counted in the 2021 Hong Kong Legislative Council election. Photo: Xinhua

Opinion

News

Hong Kong


The group of Hongkongers who championed democracy without regard to the Basic Law and the underlying concept of ‘one country, two systems’ cannot be seen as patriots



The group of Hongkongers who championed democracy without regard to the Basic Law and the underlying concept of ‘one country, two systems’ cannot be seen as patriots.


Hong Kong Basic Law

Hong Kong electoral changes

Hong Kong national security law (NSL)

Legislative Council of Hong Kong (Legco)

Universal suffrage in Hong Kong

Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)


With patriots in the driving seat, upholding the Basic Law, Hong Kong is pointing in the right direction

.css-1mniedq{color:inherit;font-weight:inherit;font-size:inherit;font-family:inherit;line-height:inherit;} The group of Hongkongers who championed democracy without regard to the Basic Law and the underlying concept of ‘one country, two systems’ cannot be seen as patriots

The group of Hongkongers who championed democracy without regard to the Basic Law and the underlying concept of ‘one country, two systems’ cannot be seen as patriots