appConfigEntityId

bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

isVideo

articlePageQuery

article

articleSchemaContent

content

hooksArticlePageAdvertisementConfigArticle

hooksArticlePageFloatingButtonConfigArticle

appConfig

filter

json

liveArticle

Walter E. Block

There is something rotten in Denmark. Well, in the US. Let’s leave the Danes out of this. What’s wrong? The 45th president of the United States was banished from the internet by Twitter. Even Senator Bernie Sanders, no supporter of Donald Trump, said he did not feel comfortable with this state of affairs.
A whole host of other lesser known figures have also been cancelled – de-platformed, and in many ways silenced – by the likes of Apple, Amazon, Facebook and Google.
What would John Stuart Mill, the philosopher who wrote On Liberty, have thought of this? He would have been appalled. And he would have been equally perturbed if the tables had been turned: if conservatives had been the powerful figures on the internet and liberals were being cancelled on grounds of “offensiveness”, “misinformation”, “hate speech” and all the rest of these very subjective indictments.
As it happens, the right wing is now in the process of reacting against this left-wing onslaught on open-ended discussion. Texas is passing legislation limiting the ability of social justice warriors in the media to squelch the views of those with whom they disagree.
Sponsors of this bill are attempting to stop liberal censorship of conservatives. There are even some libertarians who mistakenly support such initiatives.
But this – that only the government can really censor free speech and only the state can use legal violence to stop the spread of ideas – is problematic.


The major internet media argue that they have the private property right to determine what appears on their electronic pages and what does not. That alone is a switcheroo of major proportions, since these folks are not exactly well known for their support of private property rights.
However, in this particular claim they are 100 per cent correct. They own these platforms and have a right to discriminate against anyone they choose, for any reason, at least under the rubric of free market capitalism.
Nor will it do to “pull a 230” on them. This refers to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects (with some minor exceptions) internet platforms from being sued for libel for messages posted on them by participants. Is this an unjust advantage given to the large internet companies?
No, because in a truly free society, there would be no laws against defamation in the first place. Slander only ruins reputations, and since they consist only of the thoughts of other people, the person to whom they refer cannot really own the repute that refers to himself.
Germany’s social media act is no fake news law. Hong Kong should take note
How, then, can we solve the problem of one side cancelling the other? We must do so without relying on the government to stomp on the malefactors.
The answer is simple: rely upon the free enterprise system. There is no “market failure” here. Rather, what we have is an instance of what economists characterise as “network effects”, when something has value insofar as lots of people use it.
If you were the only one who had a telephone in the early days of this innovation, it would not do you much good. But as more and more people gained access to this technology, its value to you, and to everyone else, would greatly increase.
Well, millions of people use Google and other platforms. “Google” has become a veritable verb. But their days are numbered. As soon as those who resent being silenced get together, alternative institutions will be instituted.


Some may play tit-for-tat, silencing the politically correct social justice “wokesters”. More likely, there will be other platforms which truly serve the Millian ideal, and allow all shades of opinion.
There are already some indications of the light at the end of the tunnel. Gab, for example, will cancel no one, not on the far right nor on the far left. Then, there is the fact that the fastest-growing social media platform today is TikTok, a Chinese-owned upstart, not Facebook or Twitter.
So, let us get used to the present unfairness and not whine to the government about it. Laissez-faire capitalism will eventually solve this problem.
Walter E. Block, PhD, is Harold E. Wirth Eminent Scholar Endowed Chair and Professor of Economics at Loyola University New Orleans


Who is Frank Adams, WNBA star Sophie Cunningham’s rumoured new beau?

Hong Kong school told to review arrangements after alleged Cantonese video ban

Meet Catrine Spencer, the 4th wife of Princess Diana’s brother Charles Spencer

Anwar was on song in India. Will Malaysia reap the rewards?

Social media

To stop the cancel culture, sit back and let the free market take over

Social media apps Facebook, TikTok, Twitter, YouTube and Instagram are seen on a smartphone. The major internet media argue that they have the private property right to determine what appears on their electronic pages and what does not. They are right. Photo: Reuters

From hero to zero: How Weibo’s star-making ‘super hashtags’ became target of censorship

Over the past summer, Chinese authorities have cracked down on both celebrities and the fan groups that surround them. Weibo’s Chaohuas, or “super topics”, are in the crosshairs. Photo: Reuters

Fans react to Chinese actor Huang Xiaoming at right as he arrives for the 4th Beijing International Film Festival held in Beijing, China, April 16, 2014. Hugely popular online games and celebrity culture are the latest targets in the ruling Communist Party's campaign to encourage China's public to align their lives with its political and economic goals. (AP Photo/Ng Han Guan)

WUHAN, CHINA - AUGUST 28, 2021 - A mobile phone displays the Sina Weibo interface, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, On August 28, 2021. (Photo credit should read Wang Jianfeng / Costfoto/Barcroft Media via Getty Images)

=== PHOTO CAPTURED ONLINE=== Popular Chinese actor Zhang Zhehan has been caught in a political storm after taking photos at the war-linked Yasukuni Shrine, as Chinese state media launched a high-profile commemoration campaign of the 76th anniversary Japan’s defeat in World War II amid the strained relations between the Asian neighbour. Photo: Weibo

Proposed doxxing law another case of legal overreach

Photo: Shutterstock

Vitasoy trouble shows dark side of cancel culture in divided Hong Kong

A vending machine is placed outside the Vitasoy factory in Tuen Mun on July 6. Mainland social media users have turned their back on Vitasoy after a leaked company memo was seen as supportive of an attempted murder-suicide in Causeway Bay on July 1. Photo: K.Y. Cheng

Cancel culture: how Asia’s ‘woke brigade’ became a political force

Blogger Wendy Cheng, better known as Xiaxue, recently came under fire on social media. The hashtag #PunishXiaxue became the No 1 trending topic on Twitter in Singapore. Photo: EPA

A protester leads a chant down a main thoroughfare during a Black Lives Matter march through a residential neighborhood calling for racial justice, Monday, July 13, 2020, in Valley Stream, N.Y. (AP Photo/John Minchillo)

FILE - In this Thursday, Nov. 8, 2018 file photo, writer J.K. Rowling poses for the media at the world premiere of the film "Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald" in Paris. Dozens of artists, writers and academics have signed an open letter decrying the weakening of public debate, it was announced Wednesday, July 8, 2020 warning that the free exchange of information and ideas is in jeopardy. J.K. Rowling, Salman Rushdie and Margaret Atwood are among dozens of writers, artists and academics to argue against ideological conformity in an open letter in Harper’s Magazine. The letter comes amid a debate over so-called cancel culture - where prominent people face attack for sharing controversial opinions. (AP Photo/Christophe Ena, file)

=== PHOTO CAPTURED FROM FACEBOOK === Samantha Katie James. Miss Universe Malaysia 2017. FACEBOOK.

Opinion

News

World


Texas is passing a bill aimed at stopping liberal censorship of conservatives by social media companies
But the better solution is to rely on the free enterprise system. In other words, let other platforms give big tech a run for its money



Texas is passing a bill aimed at stopping liberal censorship of conservatives by social media companies. But the better solution is to rely on the free enterprise system – let other platforms give big tech a run for its money.


Internet

Donald Trump

X (formerly Twitter)

US Politics

TikTok

Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)
