Opinion

US-China relations: what Biden’s and Xi’s picks for ambassador could mean

The US could be signalling a return to diplomacy, with the rumoured choice of a diplomat with Nato experience for ambassador to China. However, the likely replacement for Beijing’s man in Washington suggests wolf warrior diplomacy may be here to stay

4-MIN READ4-MIN

Chi Wang, a former head of the Chinese section of the US Library of Congress, is president of the US-China Policy Foundation.

Published: 1:00am, 17 Jul 2021Updated: 1:50am, 17 Jul 2021

The United States and China are both in the process of appointing new ambassadors to serve in each other’s capitals. In Beijing, the post has been vacant since US ambassador Terry Branstad stepped down last October.

Meanwhile, Chinese ambassador Cui Tiankai is retiring after eight years in Washington. The vacancies come as Presidents Joe Biden and Xi Jinping court allies amid tense US-China relations.

Ongoing tensions and travel concerns during the pandemic have limited high-level exchanges of government officials, making it all the more imperative to fill the vacant ambassadorships. The individuals picked to represent Biden and Xi in each other’s capital may send strong messages about how each leader expects to engage with the other in the immediate future.

In the 1980s and 1990s, the post of US ambassador to China often went to career diplomats or government officials, including Winston Lord, James Lilley and J. Stapleton Roy. More recently, presidents have picked elected officials from states with strong trade ties to China. Branstad, former governor of Iowa, fitted this mould, as did Gary Locke of Washington and Max Baucus of Montana.