Advertisement
Opinion
Hong Kong Museum of History must flesh out the city’s story
- The interim exhibit at the museum gives much space to the culture of ‘indigenous people’, although after 1841 Hong Kong was populated largely by immigrants
- It also lacks a sense of how Hong Kong came to be a major commercial and maritime centre
4-MIN READ4-MIN
2

Philip Bowring has been based in Asia for 39 years writing on regional financial and political issues.
With the Chinese Communist Party celebrating its centenary this year, General Secretary Xi Jinping has urged study of its history, of Marxism and socialism with Chinese characteristics. The president’s focus on history reminded this writer to visit the Hong Kong Museum of History which has recently reopened.
Its earlier incarnation was often described as the best museum in Hong Kong, combining vivid visual displays with a thorough account of history, which was generally regarded as fair and balanced. What would museum designers in the era of President Xi make of this history?
Aligning it with any new expectations would not have been easy, given that though Hong Kong contributed significantly to other revolutionary history, it played scant role in that of the Communist Party. Furthermore, at almost all times in the past 180 years, since the British took possession of Hong Kong island in January 1841 – one year before this was formalised in the Treaty of Nanjing – its population has increased 1,000-fold, thanks to influxes of patriots seeking better, safer freer lives.
It would be unfair to compare the current exhibition with its predecessor. It is an interim display a fraction of the size. However, if history and identity are, as they should be, closely linked, this new exhibition suggests an effort, conscious or not, to downplay the big themes of history in favour of the harmless and meaningless.
Select Voice
Select Speed
1x
AI-generated voice
