appConfigEntityId

bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

isVideo

articlePageQuery

article

articleSchemaContent

content

hooksArticlePageAdvertisementConfigArticle

hooksArticlePageFloatingButtonConfigArticle

appConfig

filter

json

liveArticle

Tian Shichen

Bao Huaying

Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison has demanded that China apologise after Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian recently shared a post on Twitter depicting an Australian soldier holding a knife to the throat of an Afghan child.
China is not alone in criticising Australia in this regard. The findings from the Australian Defence Force inquiry sparked widespread international condemnation; a New York Times report was headlined “Blood Lust Demigods: Behind an Australian Force’s Slaughter of Helpless Afghans”.
The findings were also reported by The Indian Express, Deutsche Welle and many other media outlets. Zhao’s tweet does not add much to the condemnation since the global press has already covered the report’s publication in great detail. But why was it only the Chinese criticism that triggered Australia’s outrage?
First, this seemingly new flashpoint is only the tail of a long chain of disputes between Australia and China. The two countries have been at odds over a number of issues over the past few years, including the Turnbull government’s decision to exclude Chinese telecoms companies Huawei and ZTE from Australia’s 5G network and its introduction of foreign interference laws that were seen as targeting China’s activities.
Earlier this year, Australia called for an investigation into the origins of the coronavirus, infuriating Beijing. The quarrel over the Twitter image of Australian war crimes only aggravated the relationship, which many believe has reached its lowest point.


Second, Australia might also have felt wronged that, even though it took more accountability of its actions than others, it nevertheless appeared to have received more criticism. Prior to the publication of the Australia report, there were also claims of alleged war crimes committed by the US military in Afghanistan after the September 11 attacks, and by the British military in Iraq following the US-led invasion of the country.
These allegations prompted the International Criminal Court (ICC) to look into launching an investigation. However, both the US and Britain have so far avoided any formal investigation.
According to the complementarity principle that guides ICC operations, it may only exercise jurisdiction over international crimes when national legal systems are genuinely unable or unwilling to do so. In order to avoid prosecution by international courts, Australia has shown goodwill by initiating an investigation of its soldiers’ actions.
Yet despite these efforts, the Chinese foreign ministry’s spokesman used a particularly inflammatory image to excoriate Australia. This probably pushed the Morrison government over the edge.
After all, in the past, Australia had been the one to stand on the moral high ground to criticise China on alleged human rights violations. Now, however, it is Australian soldiers who stand accused of gross violations of humanitarian laws.


Given the facts of the war crimes committed by Australian soldiers, it is strange to see the rest of the Western world teaming up and siding with Canberra by accusing China of being biased and unprofessional in targeting Australia. Countries including the US, France and Britain, to name just a few, have showed their support for Australia in one way or another.
Such teaming up cannot be fully explained by the fact that condemnation of Australia’s behaviour during the Afghan war is to some extent equivalent to condemnation of those other countries, since many were also involved in the Afghan operation as Nato allies.
Although it was Australian soldiers who committed the war crimes, high-ranking officials from other Nato countries could bear command responsibility for failing to fulfil their duties to prevent and punish these crimes. In this respect, they are like grasshoppers tied to the same string, to quote a Chinese idiom.
The collective action of the West in standing up to China also stems from the shared democratic traditions, culture and values of Western countries. Because of these shared values, they tend to be more tolerant of one another and more critical of China.
Such double standards have shaped the Western mindset towards China – an attitude of “I can, but you can’t”, as Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying put it during one press briefing. This is not to say that China and the West have no common interests. In climate change and environmental protection, for example, it serves both sides to cooperate.
Want to be a Chinese diplomat? Program emulates ‘Wolf Warrior’ rhetoric
In recent months, China has also been criticised by the West for embracing a “wolf warrior” style of diplomacy. While Beijing should push back on the West’s double standards, Chinese diplomats also need to learn the art of diplomacy. On many occasions, China has been blamed for being aggressive simply because some of its diplomats do not know how to say “no” nicely.
If China and the West could find more common ground on which to cooperate and if Chinese diplomats learned how to handle foreign relations in a more elegant way, the number of these diplomatic rows would soon decrease sharply.
Captain (retired) Tian Shichen, a senior research fellow, is vice-president of the Grandview Institution and director of the Centre for International Law of Military Operations in Beijing. He is also a China Forum Expert. Bao Huaying is a visiting fellow at the East Asia National Resource Centre, George Washington University. She is also chief of division for international exchange in the Office for International Exchange and Cooperation at Beijing Foreign Studies University


Hyrox offers refunds to Beijing participants affected by athlete who soiled herself

China airports climb global-connectivity ranking as international routes rise: OAG report

Australia to ban student dependants as Labor fends off far-right pressure

Will ‘transactional’ America assist India in a future border crisis with China?

Australia

In Australia’s Twitter row with China, no surprise who the West sides with

Illustration: Craig Stephens

What went wrong for China and Australia, and what will happen next?

The spat over a tweet came soon after the Chinese government imposed import curbs on a slew of Australian products over the last few months, including wine, barley, copper and coal. Photo: Reuters

The national flags of Australia and China are displayed before a portrait of Mao Zedong facing Tiananmen Square, during a visit by Australia's Prime Minister Julia Gillard in Beijing on April 26, 2011. The trip is Gillard's first to China, Australia's top trading partner, and comes at a time when the communist country is waging its toughest crackdown on dissent in years. AFP PHOTO/Frederic J. BROWN (Photo credit should read FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images)

Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison meets with President Xi Jinping during the G20 in Osaka, Japan. Picture: Adam Taylor/Prime Minister's Office

Australian PM’s bid to stir nationalism over Twitter image succeeds – but in China

Australian PM Scott Morrison has demanded that China apologise over a tweet. Photo: Reuters

In this image from video, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian speaks at a briefing in Beijing Tuesday, Nov. 17, 2020. Lijian said Australia should do something “to promote mutual trust and cooperation” between the two countries, in response to the call from Australia’s trade minister Simon Birmingham for dialogue and discussion with China to stop the trade disruptions over tensions. Australia is the first country to ban China's Huawei from its 5G network and Canberra led a global effort calling for an independent probe into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, which first emerged in China’s Wuhan city. (AP Photo)

‘Wolf warrior’ misfires over war crimes meme

Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison is seen on a video link during question time in the House of Representatives at Parliament House in Canberra on Monday. Photo: AAP Image

2020 in a nutshell? Chinese state media journalist responds to US senator’s racist tweet with sexist insult

Marsha Blackburn hit back by accusing Chen of being a “puppet”. Photo: Getty Images/AFP

Chen Weihua, European Union Bureau Chief of China Daily. HANDOUT PHOTO

Is China using its clash with Australia as a warning to the world?

Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison has vowed not to compromise on his country’s values or national interests, insisting policy would never be made at the “behest of any other nation”. Photo: Reuters

A visitor wearing a face mask to protect against the coronavirus looks at a display of Australian wines at the China International Import Expo (CIIE) in Shanghai on Nov. 5, 2020. China is raising import taxes on Australian wine, stepping up pressure on Australia over disputes including its support for a probe into the origin of the coronavirus. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

Malcolm Turnbull, former Prime Minister of Australia, photographed in Admiralty. 27MAR19 SCMP / Tory Ho

epa08735122 Former Australian prime minister Kevin Rudd speaks to the media during a press conference at Brisbane City Botanic Garden in Brisbane, Australia, 11 October 2020. Rudd has launched a petition calling for a royal commission into Rupert Murdoch's media empire. EPA-EFE/GLENN HUNT AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND OUT

Opinion

News

China

World


The dispute over Australian war crimes is just the latest in a long chain of disputes between Australia and China, and Canberra was probably upset that the boot is now on the other foot
Australia’s allies have understandably taken its side. Such double standards in the West’s approach to China are nothing new



The row over Australian findings of war crimes in Afghanistan is part of a long chain of Australia-China disputes. Australia’s allies have understandably taken its side. Such double standards in the West’s approach to China are nothing new.


International Criminal Court

Diplomacy

Nato

China-Australia relations

X (formerly Twitter)

Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)


Column