Hong Kong elections: opposition must be realistic and not just oppose Beijing

Hong Kong democrats still think in terms of opposition and resistance after 23 years in the minority, something the government has fostered by not sharing power

If they do win a majority, they should provide policy alternatives that would improve the social and economic welfare of the people, not just pick fights

3-MIN READ3-MIN

Pro-democracy camp members (from left) Au Nok-hin, Benny Tai and Andrew Chiu Ka-yin hold a press conference in Mong Kok on June 9, calling on the public to participate in the opposition campaign for “35-plus” seats in the Legislative Council. What the camp intends to do with a majority should it get one remains unclear. Photo: Nora Tam

Frank Ching

Frank Ching opened The Wall Street Journal’s bureau in Beijing in 1979 when the U.

Published: 6:00am, 22 Jul 2020Updated: 6:16am, 22 Jul 2020

Count Otto von Bismarck, the noted German statesman, is known for saying, “Politics is the art of the possible, the attainable – the art of the next best.” That is to say, aim high but know when to settle.

That seems to be a lesson Hong Kong’s localists haven’t learned yet. Leading strategist and legal scholar Benny Tai Yiu-ting, who aimed high while organising the 2014 Occupy Central campaign but later admitted his civil disobedience campaign did not cause Beijing to make any concessions, doesn’t appear to have learned it either.

The opposition attempt to win a majority of Legislative Council seats in September is not exceptional; it is what opposition parties try to do. Usually, though, the opposition party has a policy programme it wants to implement after it becomes the majority party. This is where the Hong Kong opposition is different.

From 1997 on, the political landscape in Hong Kong has featured the pro-democracy and pro-establishment camps. The government has made no attempt to be inclusive, consult the opposition or share power. The pan-democrats developed a negative mentality, automatically opposing government policy without providing alternative proposals.