appConfigEntityId

bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

isVideo

articlePageQuery

article

articleSchemaContent

content

hooksArticlePageAdvertisementConfigArticle

hooksArticlePageFloatingButtonConfigArticle

appConfig

filter

json

liveArticle

Michael Chugani

It can be quite concerning to have a sword hanging over your head. One wrong move and you’re a goner. It’s even more concerning when you don’t exactly know what a wrong move is. A sword now hangs over Hong Kong in the form of a Beijing-imposed national security law.
I never thought of the new law as a sword of Damocles, even though it is sweeping. Rule of law societies aim to use laws to protect citizens, not as lethal weapons. Perhaps Zhang Xiaoming, deputy director of the Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office, didn’t understand that when he described the new law as a sword.
He sought to comfort Hongkongers with assurances that the law only targets a few who threaten national security. Laws apply to everyone, equally, in common law societies. It is legally meaningless to say a particular law only targets a few people.
What is a small minority? Thousands who sing Glory to Hong Kong during unlawful but peaceful protests? Hundreds of black-clad protesters who hurl petrol bombs or shout independence slogans? Dozens who sing protest songs in shopping malls? A few who have “liberate Hong Kong, revolution of our times” posters in their backpacks?
I sometimes unconsciously hum the catchy Glory to Hong Kong while riding the MTR. The song contains the slogan “liberate Hong Kong, revolution of our times”. What if someone videoed me to post on social media? Should I be scared? I don’t know. Even lawyers say the law is too vague to have clear answers.


The government issued a statement saying that “liberate Hong Kong, revolution of our times” is a separatist call that violates the security law. If protesters shout the slogan near the headquarters of a property developer, are they advocating independence? They could argue they wanted to liberate Hong Kong from property hegemony through a peaceful revolution.
It’s for the courts to decide what violates the law, not a government statement that smacks of a decree. Thankfully, even pro-Beijing heavyweights such as Maria Tam Wai-chu and legal scholar Albert Chen Hung-yee have said the slogan is only illegal if the government can prove in court those using it had separatist intent.
To me, the threat to national security from Hong Kong is overblown. The independence movement has gained little traction. That makes the new law a sledgehammer that hurts Hong Kong’s international reputation.
But the law is the law. We have no choice but to obey this one even though navigating through its ambiguous sections on secession, subversion, terrorism and colluding with foreign forces will be tricky. Perhaps clarity will come when cases eventually reach the courts.


What worries me now is Hong Kong’s next chapter. Zhang last month said for the first time the city’s problems are political, not housing or upward mobility. Does Beijing think the security law fixes our deep-rooted problems? Will there be an effort to reconcile our polarised society made even more divided by the security law?
The push for greater democracy was the biggest polarising factor. Beijing’s 2014 political reform framework, which the opposition rejected as fake democracy, triggered the Occupy movement. Division remained, but things calmed until Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor’s now-withdrawn extradition bill.
Mass peaceful protests morphed into violent anti-government protests when Lam initially refused to kill the bill. Beijing saw a black Western hand behind the protests and responded with a national security law.


The Basic Law promises direct elections for the chief executive and the full legislature. With the security law in place, it’s time to heal divisions by revisiting democratic reforms to prove Hong Kong still has some autonomy.
Lam said at the 23rd anniversary of reunification, “we will see the rainbow after the rainstorm”. Rainbows signify hope. How can there be hope in a ruptured society with one side yearning for true democracy and fearing the security law and the other side baying for a crackdown on the opposition?
We need to find a way out. I don’t know how.
Michael Chugani is a Hong Kong journalist and TV show host


Tung Chee-hwa, Hong Kong’s first chief executive, honoured with state funeral

Hong Kong’s political, business elite pay final respects to Tung Chee-hwa

Top Hong Kong officials, business leaders mourn Tung Chee-hwa – as it happened

Hong Kong leader says firms must strive to survive despite government support

Hong Kong politics

Uncertainty and division over national security law cloud Hong Kong’s future

A police officer in riot gear holds up a purple flag warning anti-government protesters they may be violating the national security law during an illegal demonstration in Causeway Bay on July 1, the 23rd anniversary of the establishment of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Photo: Sam Tsang

Where does Hong Kong’s national security law leave information security?

Could those who take reasonable steps to protect their computers fall afoul of the national security law for Hong Kong? Photo: Reuters

Why Beijing must respect Hong Kong courts’ interpretation of national security law

Illustration: Craig Stephens

Why disruption, not the national security law, is the main force pushing Hongkongers to leave

Is Hong Kong poised for another mass exodus, following implementation of the national security law? People appear primarily concerned about local political gridlock and lack of economic opportunities than a lack of democracy. Photo: Shutterstock

Can we trust that Beijing’s security law will target Hong Kong’s violent minority only?

Illustration: Stephen Case

Opinion


The threat to national security from Hong Kong is overblown, which makes the new law a sledgehammer that hurts the city’s international reputation. How can there be hope in a ruptured society?



Hong Kong Basic Law

Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor

Hong Kong national security law (NSL)

Two Sessions 2020 (Lianghui): All Articles

Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)


Column