Is Beijing’s national security law the right way to go about defusing the political anger in Hong Kong?

Since April, Hongkongers have faced bombshell announcements from the central and local government that raise questions about the ‘one country, two systems’ framework. These developments will not quell Hong Kong’s civil unrest

3-MIN READ3-MIN

Protesters hold up their hands to represent their five demands near the Hong Kong and Chinese flags at Exchange Square in Central on November 15, 2019. The protests have gathered steam again after the National People’s Congress announced it would introduce a national security law for Hong Kong. Photo: AP

Michael Chugani

Michael Chugani is a Hong Kong journalist and TV show host

Published: 6:25am, 11 Jun 2020Updated: 6:38am, 11 Jun 2020

The bombshells keep on coming, so fast many Hongkongers – myself included – are in a daze. By bombshells, I mean the flurry of shock waves from the north and its proxies here.

In April, Beijing blindsided us. It made clear its institutions here can supervise local affairs even though our government has since reunification held the position that these institutions are subject to Article 22 of the Basic Law. This prohibits departments of the central government from interfering in affairs which the Hong Kong government administers on its own. After three flip-flopping statements, the Hong Kong government backtracked.

That same month, commerce chief Edward Yau Tang-wah criticised an RTHK reporter for asking a World Health Organisation official a question about Taiwan being granted membership to the organisation. Weeks later, in May, the Communications Authority ruled that a popular satirical television show produced by RTHK “denigrated and insulted” the police. RTHK subsequently suspended the show.