Advertisement
Opinion | Coronavirus is not a great equaliser, but could be a force for good if we extend the lessons learnt to the post-pandemic era
- Unprecedented livelihood relief measures that have been introduced would work just as well to reduce social inequality when the emergency abates
- We must invest not only in supporting individual needs but also in strengthening the fabric of the community
Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
0
“Covid-19 does not discriminate.” This adage reminds us of our shared humanity, that anyone could catch the virus, no matter where you live or what your stature in society might be. But this idea, while partly true, also contains dangerous falsehoods.
This disease is not a great equaliser; it further exposes disparities, especially in one of the most unequal cities in the developed world. Although Hong Kong should be commended for containing the coronavirus, its impact on people has varied.
While some of us have the privilege of being able to work from home, essential workers have been tirelessly stocking our supermarkets and delivering our packages, cleaning public spaces, and caring for our loved ones as their patients. Some of us have hoarded personal protective equipment, while others, like the elderly or people with disabilities, struggle to stock up for tomorrow.
There are students learning online through their digital devices, and children who do not have access to technology. While many take refuge at home, others, who are homeless, find themselves locked out of fast-food restaurants that previously provided shelter, or locked up with their abusive partners.
Some of us will receive a HK$10,000 handout, but others, no matter how long they have contributed to the care economy, are not eligible for this support.
Ten years ago, I started my career in human rights at an organisation that sought to mitigate the devastating social impact of the global financial crisis. When I left that job to come to Hong Kong in 2012, I was shocked to realise this city had only introduced a minimum wage the previous year or that “cage homes” existed in the world’s most expensive housing market.
Advertisement