Advertisement
Extradition law could ensnare Hongkongers working with mainland Chinese in an unfamiliar legal system
- Concerns from the world of accounting and banking demonstrate why a sudden and forced melding of two dissimilar judicial systems is inadvisable for Hong Kong
3-MIN READ3-MIN
Dr Victor C.K. Wai is a retired banker and accountant.
Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor has dismissed many arguments against the proposed amendments to Hong Kong’s extradition laws as too general. It is disappointing that she wipes away the public’s distrust of the mainland’s judiciary system with such a presumptuous brush.
Anyone who has any business or personal dealings with the mainland can readily quote examples of problems with China’s legal system. If the government is incognisant of the pitfalls of the mainland’s legal system, here are examples from the experience of bankers and accountants.
Many Hong Kong-based accountants are involved with on-site auditing on the mainland. Audits are generally done on sampled accounting records. An audit is therefore as accurate as the confidence levels suggested by statistical theories; there is no guarantee of 100 per cent accuracy. If financial problems are uncovered at an audited company, stakeholders can initiate litigation against the company and its auditor under offences No 9 and 46, listed in the amended Fugitive Offenders Ordinance.
Under the common law system, case law on activities constituting negligence, gross negligence and fraud is well-established. However, under the continental law (aka civil law) system used in China, judgment is made entirely by the presiding judge according to his/her interpretation of codified statues and ordinances – no correlation with precedents required. A fair trial greatly depends on the discretion of the judge.
Select Voice
Select Speed
1x
AI-generated voice